Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0224920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224920

Table 2. LRT analysis and Tukey’s pairwise test (p≤0.05) for genomic selection prediction for the first cross-validation strategy for fresh root yield, dry root yield and dry matter content.

DF Fresh root yield Dry root yield Dry matter content
Deviance ry^y b ry^y b ry^y b
Methods 4 95.62* 1.20 42.44* 60.36* 1.26 23.7*
Cross validation 1 255.41* 50.72* 243.31* 148.42* 271.18* 114.11*
Tukey multiple comparison test
BayesB 0.4571B
(0.0472)
1.5935A
(0.0922)
0.4737B
(0.0361)
1.5435B
(0.0866)
0.5668A
(0.0261)
1.3595B
(0.0826)
BLASSO 0.4546B
(0.0477)
1.5982A
(0.0746)
0.4743B
(0.0426)
1.5686A
(0.0438)
0.5655A
(0.0488)
1.3702A
(0.0438)
G-BLUP 0.4570B
(0.0469)
1.5979A
(0.0412)
0.4689C
(0.0456)
1.5469B
(0.0329)
0.5667A
(0.0487)
1.3604B
(0.0205)
RKHS 0.4756A
(0.0452)
1.5904A
(0.0381)
0.4818A
(0.0444))
1.5603A
(0.0339)
0.5671A
(0.0497)
1.3662A
(0.0235)
RR-BLUP 0.4570B
(0.0411)
1.5980A
(0.0929)
0.4740B
(0.0329)
1.5469B
(0.0870)
0.5666A
(0.0205)
1.3605B
(0.0811)

ry^y: predictive ability; b: bias, DF: degrees of freedom.

*significance deviance for 5% probability in χ2 test.

Major letters indicate significance differences between genomic prediction methods (p<0.05) by Tukey’s pairwise test. Standard error for the genomic prediction method is in parentheses.