Table 9. Recommendations for change to optimise appropriate SAP decision-making and prescribing.
COM-B | Theme | Subtheme | Recommendations for change |
---|---|---|---|
Physical Capability |
Low priority for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing skills. | Surgical technique of greater importance | • Provide targeted education and training on principles for SAP and AMS as part of orientation training. • Increase surgeon engagement in SAP decision-making and prescribing. |
Deskilling surgeons | |||
Psychological Capability | Prescriber autonomy overrules guideline compliance. | Guideline knowledge and awareness of limitations | • Continue to increase accessibility of guidelines in the operative setting. • Increase engagement of surgeons and anaesthetists in guideline development. • Mandate documentation for rationale of guideline deviation. |
Competition as a means to regulate behaviour | • Conduct and feedback SAP prescribing audit data to departmental heads to facilitate benchmarking at multiple levels—consultant, surgical unit, hospital, state. | ||
Social Opportunity |
Social codes of prescribing reinforce established practices | Intra-specialty Hierarchy Rules | • Target AMS interventions at senior surgical consultants. • Engage with senior surgical consultants for the development and implementation of quality improvement initiatives such as AMS. |
Cross-specialty prescriber etiquette | |||
Physical Opportunity |
Need for improved communication, documentation and data for action | Poor documentation and communication | • Promote standardisation of SAP workflow and documentation, specifically; - Indication for procedural and post- procedural SAP; - Duration of post-procedural SAP, and differentiation between SAP and antibiotics for treatment of actual infection; and - Details regarding antibiotic management in the hospital discharge summary for GPs and plans for re-referral. • Modify the ‘time-out’ process to include discussion of post-operative SAP. • Develop tailored clinical decision support systems and prompts for SAP. |
‘Time-Out’ supports pre-operative communication; post-operative management is less standardised | |||
Data for action | • Engage with surgeons to identify relevant quality indicators. • Support ongoing SAP prescribing audits. • Increase capacity for auditing of outcomes in relation to quality of SAP prescribing. |
||
Automatic Motivation |
Fears and perceptions of risk hinder appropriate SAP prescribing. | Fear of infections | • Collect local outcome data that supports evidence-based SAP, rather than prolonging SAP out of fear of infections. • Highlight the potential harms to the patient from inappropriate antibiotic use to promote AMS initiatives. |
Varied risk perceptions across specialties | • Tailor AMS interventions that are reflective of the surgical specialties’ niche risk perceptions, e.g., recommend alternative non-antibiotic creams and ointments post-plastic surgical procedures. | ||
Fear of litigation | • Gather support from hospitals at an executive/policy level to enable surgeons to prescribe evidence-based SAP. • Undertake further research into the impacts and influence of private health insurers on antimicrobial prescribing. |
||
Risking career progression and job security | • Increase awareness of current fears and issues facing junior surgeons. • Collaborate with existing programs such as the RACS action plan to build a ‘culture of respect’. |
||
Reflective Motivation – |
Lack of clarity regarding the roles and accountability | The buck stops with the surgeon, ownership required | • Promote collaboration between surgeons and anaesthetists for the development of a SAP pathway or workflow that defines both professionals’ roles pre-, intra- and post-operatively to increase role clarity and accountability for SAP. • Promote electronic prescribing and AMS workflow to support greater prescriber accountability. |
Passive prescribing hinders accountability and SAP cessation | |||
Capacity for role expansion of pharmacists and nurses. | • Development and training for emerging roles of nurse and pharmacist prescribers. • Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways that include both pre and post-procedural SAP and AMS principles across the operative setting. • Partnered/collaborative SAP prescribing models |