Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0225011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225011

Table 9. Recommendations for change to optimise appropriate SAP decision-making and prescribing.

COM-B Theme Subtheme Recommendations for change
Physical
Capability
Low priority for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing skills. Surgical technique of greater importance • Provide targeted education and training on principles for SAP and AMS as part of orientation training.
• Increase surgeon engagement in SAP decision-making and prescribing.
Deskilling surgeons
Psychological Capability Prescriber autonomy overrules guideline compliance. Guideline knowledge and awareness of limitations • Continue to increase accessibility of guidelines in the operative setting.
• Increase engagement of surgeons and anaesthetists in guideline development.
• Mandate documentation for rationale of guideline deviation.
Competition as a means to regulate behaviour • Conduct and feedback SAP prescribing audit data to departmental heads to facilitate benchmarking at multiple levels—consultant, surgical unit, hospital, state.
Social
Opportunity
Social codes of prescribing reinforce established practices Intra-specialty Hierarchy Rules • Target AMS interventions at senior surgical consultants.
• Engage with senior surgical consultants for the development and implementation of quality improvement initiatives such as AMS.
Cross-specialty prescriber etiquette
Physical
Opportunity
Need for improved communication, documentation and data for action Poor documentation and communication • Promote standardisation of SAP workflow and documentation, specifically;
- Indication for procedural and post- procedural SAP;
- Duration of post-procedural SAP, and differentiation between SAP and antibiotics for treatment of actual infection; and
- Details regarding antibiotic management in the hospital discharge summary for GPs and plans for re-referral.
• Modify the ‘time-out’ process to include discussion of post-operative SAP.
• Develop tailored clinical decision support systems and prompts for SAP.
‘Time-Out’ supports pre-operative communication; post-operative management is less standardised
Data for action • Engage with surgeons to identify relevant quality indicators.
• Support ongoing SAP prescribing audits.
• Increase capacity for auditing of outcomes in relation to quality of SAP prescribing.
Automatic
Motivation
Fears and perceptions of risk hinder appropriate SAP prescribing. Fear of infections • Collect local outcome data that supports evidence-based SAP, rather than prolonging SAP out of fear of infections.
• Highlight the potential harms to the patient from inappropriate antibiotic use to promote AMS initiatives.
Varied risk perceptions across specialties • Tailor AMS interventions that are reflective of the surgical specialties’ niche risk perceptions, e.g., recommend alternative non-antibiotic creams and ointments post-plastic surgical procedures.
Fear of litigation • Gather support from hospitals at an executive/policy level to enable surgeons to prescribe evidence-based SAP.
• Undertake further research into the impacts and influence of private health insurers on antimicrobial prescribing.
Risking career progression and job security • Increase awareness of current fears and issues facing junior surgeons.
• Collaborate with existing programs such as the RACS action plan to build a ‘culture of respect’.
Reflective
Motivation –
Lack of clarity regarding the roles and accountability The buck stops with the surgeon, ownership required • Promote collaboration between surgeons and anaesthetists for the development of a SAP pathway or workflow that defines both professionals’ roles pre-, intra- and post-operatively to increase role clarity and accountability for SAP.
• Promote electronic prescribing and AMS workflow to support greater prescriber accountability.
Passive prescribing hinders accountability and SAP cessation
Capacity for role expansion of pharmacists and nurses. • Development and training for emerging roles of nurse and pharmacist prescribers.
• Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways that include both pre and post-procedural SAP and AMS principles across the operative setting.
• Partnered/collaborative SAP prescribing models