Skip to main content
OncoTargets and Therapy logoLink to OncoTargets and Therapy
. 2019 Oct 18;12:8653–8662. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S212352

Long Noncoding RNA SNHG16 Sponges miR-182-5p And miR-128-3p To Promote Retinoblastoma Cell Migration And Invasion By Targeting LASP1

Lidong Yang 1,, Liyou Zhang 1, Lu Lu 1, Yan Wang 1
PMCID: PMC6855619  PMID: 31806989

Abstract

Background

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are dysregulated and play an important role in the tumorigenesis and progression of cancers. However, the potential roles of SNHG16 in retinoblastoma progression still remain largely unclear.

Materials and methods

The expression levels of SNHG16, miR-182-5p, miR-128-3p and LASP1 in retinoblastoma tissues and cell lines were detected using qRT-PCR. The migratory and invasive abilities of retinoblastoma cells were assessed using Transwell assay. The regulatory relationships among SNHG16, miR-182-5p, miR-128-3p and LASP1 were analyzed through bioinformatics prediction and validated by luciferase reporter assay and Western blot.

Results

Here, we demonstrated that SNHG16 was frequently up-regulated in retinoblastoma tissue samples and cell lines. Clinicopathological features showed that high levels of SNHG16 were significantly associated with retinoblastoma metastasis and predicted poor overall survival. Functional studies demonstrated that knockdown of SNHG16 suppressed retinoblastoma cell migration and invasion. Mechanistic investigation revealed that SNHG16 exerted its oncogenic activity through increasing LASP1 expression and sponging miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p.

Conclusion

Taken together, our findings suggest SNHG16 as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target against retinoblastoma.

Keywords: long noncoding RNA, retinoblastoma, SNHG16, metastasis, LASP1

Introduction

Retinoblastoma is the most common childhood intraocular malignancy and approximately 8000 cases are diagnosed yearly worldwide.1 In United States, there were 3540 new estimated cases and 350 deaths with eye and orbit cancer in 2018.2 Choroidal invasion in retinoblastoma eyes is commonly observed pathologically. Tumor invasion was initiated from the retina to the sclera and post-laminar optic nerve and even metastasize to the central nervous system for late-stage retinoblastoma.3 Once diagnosed with metastasis, the overall survival of patients was significantly deteriorated. Hence, it is urgent to understand the molecular mechanisms and develop novel therapeutic strategies for retinoblastoma treatment.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are dysregulated and act as key regulators of several hallmarks of cancer biology, including cell growth, metastasis and drug resistance.46 LncRNAs could function as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) or “RNA sponges” of miRNAs and reduce their regulatory effect on target mRNA and target mRNA-mediated biological processes.7 Recent advancements in surveying lncRNA functions suggest that lncRNAs hold strong promise as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer.

SNHG16 (small nucleolar RNA host gene 16) is a processed long noncoding RNA with a length of 7585 nucleotides and located on chromosome 17q25.1. SNHG16 was first reported to be up-regulated in colorectal cancer and silencing of SNHG16 suppressed cell viability and migration and increased apoptotic cell death.8 In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, high SNHG16 expression level is an independent predictor of poor survival and promotes cell proliferation and invasion by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.9 These findings suggest an oncogene role of SNHG16 in certain tumors. Accumulating evidence demonstrate that SNHG16 can act as ceRNA to regulate target gene expression through sponging several miRNAs, including miR-520d-3p, miR-135a, miR-195, miR-146a-5p and miR-373.1014 However, the potential functions of SNHG16 in retinoblastoma are still largely unknown.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression profile, clinical significance and functional roles of SNHG16 in retinoblastoma and to also explore the underlying mechanism in which SNHG16 affects the progression of retinoblastoma. We found that SNHG16 was commonly up-regulated in retinoblastoma tissues and cell lines and significantly associated with retinoblastoma metastasis. Further studies revealed that SNHG16 promoted migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells through sponging miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p.

Materials And Methods

Patients And Samples

Seventy-six human retinoblastoma specimens (42 males and 34 females, aged from 5 months to 15.2 years and averaged 4.8 years) and 15 normal retina tissues (9 males and 6 females, aged from 4.4 to 14.6 years and averaged 6.7 years) were collected from Cangzhou Central Hospital between 2013 and 2017. According to the international classification of retinoblastoma (ICRB), stages I–V of retinoblastoma patients were 8, 7, 36, 18 and 7, respectively. As most retinoblastoma patients were infants, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy will cause serious physical injury. The routine treatment for retinoblastoma patients is enucleation. Tumor samples were collected during enucleation surgery and normal retina tissues were mainly obtained from the donation of accidental death. None of the subjects had received any preoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Histological and pathological diagnoses of these specimens were confirmed and classified by two experienced clinical pathologists. Median follow-up time was 18.0 months (range 1.0–58.0 months). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was carried out in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Cangzhou Central Hospital (No. 2017-069).

Cell Culture And Transfection

Human retinoblastoma cell lines WERI-RB1, SO-RB50, Y79 and human retinal pigment epithelial cell line ARPE-19 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone) under a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C with 5% CO2. 293T cells were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank (Shanghai, China) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco). SNHG16-specific siRNA (si-SNHG16), siRNA negative control (si-NC), miR-182-5p mimics, miR-128-3p mimics, miR-182-5p inhibitor (miR-182-5p in), miR-128-3p inhibitor (miR-128-3p in) and miRNA negative control (miRNA NC) were synthesized by GenePharma (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). The transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cell Migration And Invasion Assays

Cell migration and invasion assays were determined through transwell chamber (8 μM pore size, (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA). For migration assay, cells were plated into the upper chamber. For invasion assay, cells were added into the upper chamber pre-coated with 50 μL Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and cultured with serum-free medium. The lower chamber was filled with RPMI-1640 medium containing 20% FBS. After 24 hrs, the invaded cells were fixed and stained with 1% crystal violet. The migrated and invaded cells were counted under a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

RNA Isolation And qRT-PCR

Total RNA from the retinoblastoma tissues and cell lines was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Determinations of SNHG16, mRNA and miRNAs were performed with the SYBR Premix ExTaq (TaKaRa) and Mir-X miRNA First Strand Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa), respectively. β-actin and U6 were used as the normalization controls for SNHG16, mRNA and miRNAs, respectively. The relative expression levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCT method.

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. Equal amounts of protein samples were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, LASP1 and β-actin) (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology) at 4 °C overnight, respectively. Then, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 hrs. Protein bands were detected with chemiluminescence, and the protein expression levels were normalized to β-actin.

Immunohistochemical Staining

Tissues were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (4 μm), and the levels of LASP1 (1:250; Cell Signaling Technology) were analyzed following the standard protocol. Stained tissue sections were evaluated separately by two pathologists.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

A fragment of the wild and mutant reporter plasmids of SNHG16 (WT-182-SNHG16, Mut-182-SNHG16, WT-128-SNHG16, Mut-128-SNHG16) and LASP1 (WT-182-LASP1, Mut-182-LASP1, WT-128-LASP1, Mut-128-LASP1) containing the putative binding sites for miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p were synthesized by GenePharma (GenePharma) and cloned into psiCHECK-2 vectors (Invitrogen). For luciferase assay, cells were co-transfected WT or Mut reporter with miRNA mimics or miRNA NC. After 48-hr transfection, luciferase activity was determined using a Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and each experiment was performed in triplicate at least. The differences between groups were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA using Graphpad Prism 5 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

SNHG16 Is Significantly Up-Regulated In Retinoblastoma And Associated With Poor Prognosis

To investigate the functional roles of SNHG16 in the development of retinoblastoma, the expression levels of SNHG16 in 76 retinoblastoma tissues and normal retina tissues were determined using qRT-PCR. The results showed that SNHG16 was elevated in most retinoblastoma tissues (58/76, 76.31%) when compared with non-tumor tissues (Figure 1A and B). Additionally, clinicopathological feature analysis results demonstrated that up-regulated SNHG16 expression was positively correlated with TNM stage (p=0.004), choroidal invasion (p=0.011) and optic nerve invasion (p=0.009; Table 1). Kaplan–Meier analysis and log rank test revealed that elevated SNHG16 level was markedly associated with poor overall survival of retinoblastoma patients (p=0.006; Figure 1C). SNHG16 expression was also up-regulated in retinoblastoma cell lines compared with normal retina cell lines (Figure 1D). These results indicated that SNHG16 may play an important role in retinoblastoma metastasis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SNHG16 was significantly up-regulated in retinoblastoma and associated with poor prognosis.

Notes: (A) and (B) qRT-PCR analysis of SNHG6 expression in 76 retinoblastoma tissues compared with non-tumor retina tissues. (C) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated that overall survival in the patients with high SNHG16 was significantly shorter than that in the patients with low SNHG16, p = 0.006. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of SNHG6 expression in retinoblastoma cell lines and human retinal pigment epithelial cell line. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with the control group.

Table 1.

SNHG16 Expression And Clinicopathologic Features Of Retinoblastoma Patients

Features Number SNHG16 expression P-value
High Low
Gender 0.568
 Male 42 31 11
 Female 34 27 7
Age at diagnosis 0.889
 ≥5 60 46 14
 <5 16 12 4
Tumor size (mm) 0.083
 <10 33 22 11
 ≥10 43 36 7
Tumor laterality 0.824
 Unilateral 49 37 12
 Bilateral 27 21 6
Differentiation grade 0.597
 Well/moderately 51 38 13
 Poor 53 20 5
Choroidal invasion 0.011
 Yes 35 22 13
 No 41 34 5
Optic nerve invasion 0.009
 Yes 33 30 3
 No 43 28 15
TNM stage 0.004
 I–II 29 17 12
 III–IV 47 41 6

Note: High: ≥ level in normal retina tissues; low: < level in normal retina tissues.

Knockdown Of SNHG16 Inhibits Migration And Invasion Of SO-RB50 And Y79 Cells

Next, we determined whether SNHG16 could regulate cell migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells. The specific siRNA of SNHG16 significantly decreased the expression level of SNHG16 in SO-RB50 and Y79 cells (Supplementary Figure 1). The migratory and invasive abilities of retinoblastoma cells were assessed using Transwell migration and invasion assays. We observed strong inhibition of cellular migration and invasion following SNHG16 knockdown relative to control cells (Figure 2AD). In addition, knockdown of SNHG16 increased E-cadherin expression and decreased N-cadherin and vimentin expression in both SO-RB50 and Y79 cells (Figure 2E and F). These findings suggested that SNHG16 promotes migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Knockdown of SNHG16 inhibited migration and invasion of SO-RB50 and Y79 cells.

Notes: (A) and (B) Transwell migration assay was performed to evaluate the migration ability after cells transfected with si-SNHG16 or si-NC in SO-RB50 (A) and Y79 (B) cells. (C) and (D) Transwell invasion assay was applied to determine the effect of knockdown of SNHG16 on migration ability in SO-RB50 (C) and Y79 (D) cells. (E) and (F) The expressions of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin were determined using Western blot in SO-RB50 (E) and Y79 (F) cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with the control group. Scale bar, 100 mm.

SNHG16 Directly Binds To miR-182-5p And miR-128-3p

Given that lncRNAs could bind to different miRNAs and regulate downstream genes, we found that the 3ʹUTR of SNHG16 contains binding sites of miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p predicted through starBase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) (Figure 3A). miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p expression levels in retinoblastoma tissues were determined using qRT-PCR. The results showed a down-regulation of miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p in retinoblastoma (Figure 3B). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that SNHG16 expression was negatively correlated with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p in retinoblastoma (Figure 3C). Knockdown of SNHG16 increased miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p expression in retinoblastoma cells (Figure 3D). Conversely, transfection with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p mimics also decreased SNHG16 expression (Figure 3E). We further validated the target relationship between SNHG16 and miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p using luciferase reporter assay. Co-transfection miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p mimics with SNHG16 3ʹUTR WT vector significantly decreased luciferase activity compared with miRNA negative control or SNHG16 3ʹUTR Mut vector (Figure 3F). These results indicate that SNHG16 directly interacts with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

SNHG16 directly binds to miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p.

Notes: (A) Binding sites of SNHG16 for miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p predicted by starBase. (B) and (C) qRT-PCR analysis of miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p level in retinoblastoma tissues and non-tumor retina tissues. (C) Pearson correlation analysis of the relationship between SNHG16 and miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p. (D) miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p expression levels in SO-RB50 and Y79 cells after transfected with si-SNHG16 or si-NC. (E) SNHG16 expression level in SO-RB50 and Y79 cells after transfected with miR-182-5p, miR-128-3p mimics or miRNA negative control. (F) Luciferase activity of 293T cells co-transfected with either wild-type or mutant luciferase SNHG16 vectors with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p mimics or miRNA negative. (G) RB50 and Y79 cells were transfected with miR-182-5p mimics, miR-128-3p mimics or miRNA negative control. Migrated or invasive cells were detected by Transwell assays. (H) RB50 and Y79 cells were co-transfected si-SNHG16, si-NC with miR-182-5p inhibitor, miR-128-3p inhibitor or miRNA negative. Transwell assays results showed that miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p inhibitor attenuated the effects of SNHG16 on migration and invasion in retinoblastoma cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments, **p<0.01 compared with the control group.

To explore whether miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p could regulate retinoblastoma metastasis, SO-RB50 and Y79 cells were transfected with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p mimics or miRNA negative control and the relative expressions of miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p were determined using qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure 2). Inhibited cell migrations were observed in SO-RB50 and Y79 cells induced by overexpression of miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p (Figure 3G). Consistent with this observation, transfection with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p mimics also decreased the number of cells to invade through a layer of extracellular matrix. Additionally, miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p inhibitor attenuated the effects of SNHG16 on migration and invasion in SO-RB50 and Y79 cells (Figure 3H). The results suggest that miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p function as a tumor suppressor and mediate SNHG16-induced metastasis in the progression of retinoblastoma.

SNHG16 Promotes The Migration And Invasion Of Retinoblastoma By Sponging miR-182-5p And miR-128-3p To Regulate LASP1

According to previous studies and our bioinformatics analysis, we found that LASP1 was closely related to the migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells. LASP1 was up-regulated in both retinoblastoma cells and tissues (Figure 4A and B) and knockdown of LASP1 inhibited migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells (Figure 4C and D). As shown in Figure 4E, the 3ʹUTR of LASP1 was predicted to sponge to miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p by TargetScan, starBase and microRNA.org. To verify these predicted relationships, luciferase reporter assay was performed. The luciferase activity of LASP1 3ʹUTR WT reporter vector, but not Mut vector, was obviously reduced after transfected with miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p mimics compared with miRNA negative control (Figure 4F). Western blot result demonstrated that knockdown of SNHG16 decreased LASP1 expression level, but LASP1 was increased following by transfection with miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p inhibitor compared with miRNA NC or si-SNHG16 group (Figure 4G). Taken together, the results indicate that SNHG16 decoyed miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p to facilitate LASP1-mediated migration and invasion in retinoblastoma.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SNHG16 promotes the migration and invasion of retinoblastoma by sponging miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p to regulate LASP1.

Notes: (A) LASP1 level in retinoblastoma specimens and normal retina tissues determined using qRT-PCR and Immunohistochemical staining (magnification ×200, scale bar: 50 µm). (B) LASP1 level in retinoblastoma cell lines and human retinal pigment epithelial cell line determined using qRT-PCR. (C) and (D) Transwell assay results demonstrated that knockdown of LASP1 suppressed cell migration and invasion in RB50 and Y79 cells. (E) The predicted binding sites of LASP1 for miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p using TargetScan. (F) Luciferase activity of 293T cells co-transfected with either wild-type or mutant LASP1 luciferase vectors with miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p mimics or miRNA negative. (G) RB50 and Y79 cells were co-transfected si-SNHG16, si-NC with miR-182-5p inhibitor, miR-128-3p inhibitor or miRNA negative. LASP1 level was determined using Western blot. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with the control group.

Discussion

SNHG16 was frequently up-regulated and has been identified as oncogene in most human cancers, yet its function in the pathogenesis of retinoblastoma is unclear. In this study, we found that SNHG16 was significantly highly expressed in retinoblastoma tissues and cell lines compared with normal controls. We also observed that a high level of SNHG16 was associated with poor prognosis of patients with retinoblastoma. Clinicopathological features further revealed that up-regulated SNHG16 expression was positively correlated with TNM stage, present choroidal invasion and present optic nerve invasion. These findings indicated that SNHG16 may exert its oncogene role through promoting cell metastasis in the progression of retinoblastoma.

Tumor metastasis causes more than 90% of cancer cell mortality. Consistent with the previous reports, we observed that transfection with specific siRNA for SNHG16 obviously decreased the migratory and invasive abilities of retinoblastoma cells compared with negative control. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a crucial process responsible for cancer metastasis.1517 Knockdown of SNHG16 also regulates the expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin. These results suggest an important role of SNHG16 in the retinoblastoma metastasis.

We identified that miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p were down-regulated in retinoblastoma, negatively correlated with SNHG16 expression. Overexpression of miR-182-5p or miR-128-3p inhibited cell migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells. Further investigation illuminated that miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p interacted and regulated SNHG16 expression. In the previous studies, miR-182-5p was reported to function as a tumor suppressor of cancer metastasis through regulating RAB27A, FOXO3a, ARRDC3, PTEN and Cofilin 1.1821 Dysregulated miR-182-5p was also involved in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, chondrogenesis, lupus nephritis and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.2326 Several studies also indicated that miR-128-3p was down-regulated in several types of cancer, and restoration of miR-128-3p inhibited cell migration and invasion. For example, miR-128-3p inhibits metastasis and EMT by targeting ZEB1 in esophageal squamous cell cancer, reduces the migration and invasion ability of glioma cell through regulating GREM1 and suppresses osteosarcoma proliferation and metastasis by reducing VEGFC.2729 miR-128-3p also plays a key role in regulating the development and progression of rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes and atrial fibrillation.3032

LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1) was located at 17q12 and initially identified in breast cancer metastatic lymph nodes.33 Recent studies have suggested that LASP1 is an important prognostic marker and associated with tumor size, stage and metastasis in different tumors.34 LASP1 has been identified as the target gene of many miRNAs regulating metastasis, such as miR-133ab, miR-29ab, miR-1, miR-203 and miR-218.3541 In this study, we observed that SNHG16 promoted migration and invasion of retinoblastoma cells by regulating LASP1 via competitively sponging miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p. LASP1 promoting retinoblastoma metastasis may be through its interaction with cytoskeleton and increased nuclear translocation of CXCR1-4, UHRF1 and AP-1.4244 However, the detailed mechanisms still need to be further investigated.

Conclusion

In summary, we identified SNHG16 as a metastasis-specific oncogenic lncRNA in retinoblastoma and revealed a novel ceRNA regulatory pathway in which SNHG16 increased LASP1 expression by sponging miR-182-5p and miR-128-3p. Thus, SNHG16 is a novel biomarker and therapeutic potential target against retinoblastoma.

Disclosure

The authors declare no competing financial interests in this work.

Reference

  • 1.Pascual-Pasto G, Bazan-Peregrino M, Olaciregui NG, et al. Therapeutic targeting of the RB1 pathway in retinoblastoma with the oncolytic adenovirus VCN-01. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(476):pii: eaat9321. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat9321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gündüz K, Müftüoglu O, Günalp I, Unal E, Taçyildiz N. Metastatic retinoblastoma clinical features, treatment, and prognosis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1558–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bhan A, Soleimani M, Mandal SS. Long noncoding RNA and cancer: a new paradigm. Cancer Res. 2017;77(15):3965–3981. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bach DH, Lee SK. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:152–166. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xie W, Yuan S, Sun Z, Li Y. Long noncoding and circular RNAs in lung cancer: advances and perspectives. Epigenomics. 2016;8(9):1275–1287. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tay Y, Rinn J, Pandolfi PP. The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition. Nature. 2014;505(7483):344–352. doi: 10.1038/nature12986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Christensen LL, True K, Hamilton MP, et al. SNHG16 is regulated by the Wnt pathway in colorectal cancer and affects genes involved in lipid metabolism. Mol Oncol. 2016;10(8):1266–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han GH, Lu KJ, Wang P, Ye J, Ye -Y-Y, Huang J-X. LncRNA SNHG16 predicts poor prognosis in ESCC and promotes cell proliferation and invasion by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(12):3795–3803. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201806_15262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhao W, Fu H, Zhang S, et al. LncRNA SNHG16 drives proliferation, migration, and invasion of hemangioma endothelial cell through modulation of miR-520d-3p/STAT3 axis. Cancer Med. 2018;7:3311–3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang X, Kan J, Han J, Zhang W, Bai L, Wu H. LncRNA SNHG16 functions as an oncogene by sponging MiR-135a and promotes JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway in gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10(4):1013–1022. doi: 10.7150/jca.29527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xie X, Xu X, Sun C, Yu Z. Long intergenic noncoding RNA SNHG16 interacts with miR-195 to promote proliferation, invasion and tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Cell Res. 2019;383:111501. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou Z, Zhu Y, Gao G, Zhang Y. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 targets miR-146a-5p/CCL5 to regulate LPS-induced WI-38 cell apoptosis and inflammation in acute pneumonia. Life Sci. 2019;228:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou XY, Liu H, Ding ZB, et al. lncRNA SNHG16 promotes glioma tumorigenicity through miR-373/EGFR axis by activating PI3K/AKT pathway. Genomics. 2019;pii: S0888-7543(18)30545–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Voulgari A, Pintzas A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: mechanisms, markers and strategies to overcome drug resistance in the clinic. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1796(2):75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chaffer CL, San Juan BP, Lim E, Weinberg RA. EMT, cell plasticity and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):645–654. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9648-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ombrato L, Malanchi I. The EMT universe: space between cancer cell dissemination and metastasis initiation. Crit Rev Oncog. 2014;19(5):349–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li Y, Chen S, Shan Z, et al. miR-182-5p improves the viability, mitosis, migration, and invasion ability of human gastric cancer cells by down-regulating RAB27A. Biosci Rep. 2017;37(3):pii: BSR20170136. doi: 10.1042/BSR20170136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 19.Cao MQ, You AB, Zhu XD, et al. miR-182-5p promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by repressing FOXO3a. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0555-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yao J, Xu C, Fang Z, et al. Androgen receptor regulated microRNA miR-182-5p promotes prostate cancer progression by targeting the ARRDC3/ITGB4 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;474(1):213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.04.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao YS, Yang WC, Xin HW, Han JX, Ma SG. miR-182-5p knockdown targeting PTEN inhibits cell proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells. Yonsei Med J. 2019;60(2):148–157. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.2.148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang F, Wu D, Xu Z, et al. miR-182-5p affects human bladder cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion through regulating Cofilin 1. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:42. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0758-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liang Q, Chen H, Xu X, Jiang W. miR-182-5p attenuates high-fat-diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Ann Hepatol. 2018;18(1):116–125. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bai M, Yin H, Zhao J, Li Y, Wu Y. miR-182-5p overexpression inhibits chondrogenesis by down-regulating PTHLH. Cell Biol Int. 2019;43(3):222–232. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X, Wang G, Zhang X, et al. Inhibition of microRNA-182-5p contributes to attenuation of lupus nephritis via Foxo1 signaling. Exp Cell Res. 2018;373(1–2):91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.09.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang J, Xu Z, Chen X, et al. MicroRNA-182-5p attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting Toll-like receptor 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;505(3):677–684. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao L, Li R, Xu S, et al. Tumor suppressor miR-128-3p inhibits metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 in esophageal squamous-cell cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2018;50(2):171–180. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmx132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fu C, Li D, Zhang X, Liu N, Chi G, Jin X. LncRNA PVT1 facilitates tumorigenesis and progression of glioma via regulation of MiR-128-3p/GREM1 axis and BMP signaling pathway. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(4):1139–1157. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0649-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 29.Zhang C, Xie L, Liang H, Cui Y. LncRNA MIAT facilitates osteosarcoma progression by regulating miR-128-3p/VEGFC axis. IUBMB Life. 2019;71:845–853. doi: 10.1002/iub.v71.7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xia Z, Meng F, Liu Y, et al. Decreased MiR-128-3p alleviates the progression of rheumatoid arthritis by up-regulating the expression of TNFAIP3. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(4):pii: BSR20180540. doi: 10.1042/BSR20180540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang XY, Zhang XZ, Li F, Ji Q-R. MiR-128-3p accelerates cardiovascular calcification and insulin resistance through ISL1-dependent Wnt pathway in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(4):4997–5010. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cao F, Li Z, Ding WM, Yan L, Zhao Q-Y. LncRNA PVT1 regulates atrial fibrosis via miR-128-3p-SP1-TGF-β1-Smad axis in atrial fibrillation. Mol Med. 2019;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s10020-019-0074-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomasetto C, Moog-Lutz C, Régnier CH, Schreiber V, Basset P, Rio MC. Lasp-1 (MLN 50) defines a new LIM protein subfamily characterized by the association of LIM and SH3 domains. FEBS Lett. 1995;373(3):245–249. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01040-l [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hu Z, Wang X, Cui Y, Li C, Wang S. LASP1 in tumor and tumor microenvironment. Curr Mol Med. 2017;17(8):541–548. doi: 10.2174/1566524018666180222115103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang H, An H, Wang B, et al. miR-133a represses tumour growth and metastasis in colorectal cancer by targeting LIM and SH3 protein 1 and inhibiting the MAPK pathway. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(18):3924–3935. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li H, Xiang Z, Liu Y, Xu B, Tang J. MicroRNA-133b inhibits proliferation, cellular migration, and invasion via targeting LASP1 in hepatocarcinoma cells. Oncol Res. 2017;25(8):1269–1282. doi: 10.3727/096504017X14850151453092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hu Z, Cui Y, Zhou Y, et al. MicroRNA-29a plays a suppressive role in non-small cell lung cancer cells via targeting LASP1. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:6999–7009. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S116509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li H, Liu G, Pan K, Miao X, Xie Y. Methylation-induced downregulation and tumor suppressive role of microRNA-29b in gastric cancer through targeting LASP1. Oncotarget. 2017;8(56):95880–95895. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 39.Du YY, Zhao LM, Chen L, et al. The tumor-suppressive function of miR-1 by targeting LASP1 and TAGLN2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(2):384–393. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tan J, Jing YY, Han L, et al. MicroRNA-203 inhibits invasion and induces apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells via targeting LASP1. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(19):6350–6357. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201810_16046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nishikawa R, Goto Y, Sakamoto S, et al. Tumor-suppressive microRNA-218 inhibits cancer cell migration and invasion via targeting of LASP1 in prostate cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(7):802–811. doi: 10.1111/cas.12441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raman D, Sai J, Neel NF, Chew CS, Richmond A, Unutmaz D. LIM and SH3 protein-1 modulates CXCR2-mediated cell migration. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Duvall-Noelle N, Karwandyar A, Richmond A, Raman D. LASP-1: a nuclear hub for the UHRF1-DNMT1-G9a-Snail1 complex. Oncogene. 2016;35(9):1122–1133. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Endres M, Kneitz S, Orth MF, Perera RK, Zernecke A, Butt E. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression and secretion in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1). Oncotarget. 2016;7(39):64244–64259. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from OncoTargets and therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES