Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0225160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225160

Table 3. Percentage of intestinal segments rated as diagnostic on a two-point scale in terms of the possibility to rule out a potential underlying pathology by CT-Scanner.

Segment water group (n = 92) mannitol group (n = 88) p-value
R1 [%] R2 [%] R1 [%] R2 [%] R1 R2
64-row CT n = 71 n = 61
descending duodenum 35 51 36 44 0.921 0.463
horizontal duodenum 18 32 25 30 0.382 0.724
proximal jejunum 8 21 10 15 0.787 0.348
distal jejunum 34 24 61 43 0.002 0.023
proximal ileum 46 65 66 70 0.029 0.489
distal ileum 58 52 74 48 0.055 0.604
Mean percentage over all segments 33 41 45 42
16-row CT n = 21 n = 27
descending duodenum 29 52 22 44 0.628 0.597
horizontal duodenum 19 33 4 30 0.091 0.796
proximal jejunum 5 10 4 33 0.881 0.056
distal jejunum 38 19 74 67 0.014 0.001
proximal ileum 33 62 70 93 0.012 0.011
distal ileum 52 33 78 63 0.069 0.045
Mean percentage over all segments 29 35 42 55

R1 = reader 1; R2 = reader 2; p-values: Mann-Whitney-test.