Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;106(12):1632–1639. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11320

Table 1.

Patient and tumour characteristics among patients with clinically node‐positive disease

No. of patients* (n = 139)
Treating centre
University Medical Centre Utrecht 23 (16·5)
Amphia Hospital 22 (15·8)
Medical Centre Haaglanden 59 (42·4)
Alrijne Hospital 35 (25·2)
Age (years) 56 (26–82)
Clinical tumour category
cT1 19 (14)
cT2 78 (57·4)
cT3 27 (19·9)
cT4 12 (8·8)
Clinical node category
cN1 102 (73·4)
cN2 26 (18·7)
cN3 11 (7·9)
Histology
Ductal 117 (84·2)
Lobular 10 (7·2)
Ductulolobular 7 (5·0)
Other§ 5 (3·6)
Molecular subtype
HR+/HER2+ 24 (17·3)
HR–/HER2+ 22 (15·8)
HR+/HER2– 68 (48·9)
Triple‐negative 25 (18·0)
Method of confirmation of nodal positivity
FNAC 126 (90·6)
CNB 13 (9·4)
*

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise;

values are median (range).

Data available for 136 patients; one patient had relapse in mastectomy scar (patient A), one had ductal carcinoma in situ after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) but no histopathological diagnosis before NST (patient B), and one had axillary relapse without signs of local relapse (patient C).

§

Tubulolobular carcinoma in one patient, tubular carcinoma in one patient, data missing for three patients (including patients B and C). HR, hormone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; FNAC, fine‐needle aspiration cytology; CNB, core needle biopsy.