Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;58(44):15631–15635. doi: 10.1002/anie.201908046

Table 1.

Optimization of conditions for cyclometalation of 2‐bromobiphenyl (2 a). Inline graphic

Entry

Reagent

(1.1 equiv)

T

[°C]

t

[min]

Conv.

[%][b]

Yield

[%][b,c]

1

nBuLi [a]

−50

30

100

0

2

nBu2 Mg

rt

60

23

0

3

nBu2 SmMe⋅5LiCl

−30 to rt

30

100

31[d]

4

nBu2 SmCl⋅4 LiCl

−30 to rt

30

100

40[d]

5

nBu2 LaCl⋅4 LiCl

−50

60

100

61[e]

6

nBu2 LaCl⋅4 LiCl

−50 to rt

30

100

89[e]

7

nBu2 LaCl⋅4 LiCl

−50 to 0

30

100

90(79[f])

8

nBu2 LaCl⋅4 LiCl

−50 to 0

60

100

80

[a] 2.2 equiv was used. [b] Determined by GC analysis. [c] The observed byproducts were mostly biphenyl, 2‐butylbiphenyl, and 2‐iodobiphenyl. [d] 2‐Butylbiphenyl was mainly generated. [e] 2‐Butylbiphenyl was observed in minor amounts. [f] Yield of isolated, analytically pure product.