Skip to main content
. 2019 Autumn;10(4):417–423. doi: 10.22088/cjim.10.4.417

Table 2.

Results of patients’ cystoscopy and sonography and the concordance of both methods (n=60)

Variable Cystoscopy Sonography Concordance P-value
Bladder tumor
Yes
No
7(11.7)
53(88.3)
7(11.7)
53(88.3)
5(8.3)
51(85)
<0.001
Tumor shape
Polypoids
Sessile
Infiltrative
No
5(8.3)
2(3.3)
-
53(88.3)
3(5)
2(3.30
2(3.3)
53(88.3)
3(5)
191.7)
-
51(85)
<0.001
Tumor location
Base
Bladder base
Left lateral wall
Right lateral wall
Bladder neck
4(6.7)
2(3.3)
1(1.7)
-
53(88.3)
2(3.3)
3(5)
1(1.7)
1(1.7)
53(88.3)
2(3.3)
2(3.3)
1(1.7)
-
51(85)
<0.001
Tumor length
<5mm
mm 5-15
mm 15-25
>25 mm
N
2(3.3)
2(3.3)
2(3.30
1(1.7)
53(88.3)
-
2(3.3)
2(3.3)
3(5)
53(88.3)
-
2(3.3)
2(3.3)
1(1.7)
51(85)
<0.001
Internal flow
Yes
No
-
-
2(3.3)
58(96.8)
-
-
-
Calcification
Yes
No
-
60(100)
-
60(100)
-
60(100)
-
Diverticulum
Narrow
Neck
-
60(100)
1(1.7)
59(98.3)
-
59(98.3)
-
Trabeculation
Yes
No
30(50)
30(50)
10(16.7)
50(83.3)
7(11.7)
27(45)
0.171
Prostate median lobe bulging
Yes
No
5(13.5)
32(86.5)
3(8.1)
34(91.9)
3(8.1)
32(86.5)
<0.001
Bladder stone
Yes
No
-
60(100)
1(1.7)
59(98.3)
1(1.7)
59(98.3)
-

The bulging of prostate median lobe was evaluated in men (n=37)