Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;12(20):4679–4684. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201901885

Table 1.

Matrix of sample runs with the experimental conditions, the respective points in the space of design, the block subdivision, and the response results.[a]

Run

Space type

A

[min]

B

[h]

C

[equiv.]

Response

[mmol g−1]

Block

1

factorial

20

1

2

2.8

1

2

factorial

20

8

1.25

4.6

3

factorial

20

8

2

2.4

4

factorial

20

1

1.25

4

5

factorial

2

8

1.25

7.7

6

factorial

2

8

2

6.5

7

center

11

4.5

1.625

3.9

8

center

11

4.5

1.625

3.3

9

factorial

2

1

1.25

3

10

factorial

2

1

2

2.7

11

axial

11

8

1.625

3.9

2

12

axial

11

4.5

1.25

3.5

13

axial

11

4.5

2

3

14

axial

11

1

1.625

1.1

15

axial

2

4.5

1.625

3.5

16

center

11

4.5

1.625

2.4

17

axial

20

4.5

1.625

2.6

[a] A=milling time; B=resting time; C=ratio NaIO4/cellulose (molar equiv.); response=aldehyde content.