Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;10:798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00798

Table 3.

Demographics of the CCU admission cohort.

Staffing model Clinical Integrated Total Teste p
Site Site 1
(n = 53)
Site 2
(n = 52)
Site 3
(n = 40)
N = 145
Demographics
Age at admission (x¯, years) 31.1 (8.7) 32.1 (8.7) 31.0 (9.8) 31.4 (9.0) F(2,142) = .214 .808
Male sex 66.0% 78.8% 77.5% 73.8% X2 (2) = 2.619 .270
Australian born 86.8% 90.4% 77.5% 85.5% X2 (2) = 3.140 .208
ATSI identification 6.0% 3.8% 10% 6.2% Fisher’s Exact Testf .525
Unemploymenta 90.6% 82.7% 95.0% 89.0% X2 (2) = 3.707 .157
Accommodation (most recent) b Fisher’s Exact Testf .066
Living with family 56.6% 50.0% 72.5% 58.6%
Supported housing 18.9% 5.8% 10.0% 11.7%
Private rental 9.4% 15.4% 10.0% 11.7%
No fixed address 7.5% 21.2% 2.5% 11.0%
Other 7.5% 7.7% 5.0% 6.9%
Highest education level c H(2) = 1.898 .387
Primary school 5.7% 3.8% 7.5% 5.5%
Year 10 41.5% 55.8% 50.0% 49.0%
Year 12 34.0% 19.2% 35.0% 29.0%
Tertiaryd 18.9% 19.2% 7.5% 15.9%
a

Unemployment is exclusive of any form of paid or unpaid vocational activity including volunteering.

b

Accommodation reflects the most recent community residence prior to CCU entry, public housing accounted for 70% of the ‘Other’ category.

c

Treated as a scaled variable based on increasing levels of education, Kruskall-Wallis test applied.

d

Inclusive of any engagement in tertiary education including vocational training regardless of completion

e

For categorical variables, X2 was applied unless the expected count for any cell was <5, in this case, Fisher’s Exact test was calculated.

f

Unadjusted odds ratio: Accommodation = 14.200, ATSI identification = 1.500.