Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e031438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031438

Table 3.

Quantitative evaluation of reach

No (%) of 3D reviews delivered
Practice level analysis n=16 practices
Reach (% expected number of reviews delivered)
 First review Median 66% (range 38%–94%)
 Second review Median 47% (range 0%–93%)
Patient level analysis n=797
Delivery of 3D nurse and GP reviews*
 Two 3D reviews with both GP and nurse (full) 390 (49%)
 One 3D review with both GP and nurse (partial) 205 (26%)
 Other (eg, nurse review but no GP review) (partial) 31 (4%)
 No 3D reviews (none) 171 (21%)

*622 (78%) patients had at least one nurse review; 599 (75%) had at least one GP review. 390 (49%) patients received a ‘full’ intervention (defined as having two reviews, with each review involving a nurse and a GP appointment which could be on the same day or different days that is, four appointments in total) in the 15 months of follow-up. 21% received no intervention.

GP, general practitioner.