Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;16(3):488–501. doi: 10.1007/s10393-019-01433-3

Table 3.

Microbiology and Serology Status of Samples (Tissues and Blood, Respectively) Collected from Muskoxen that had Gross Lesions with Brucella Infection Listed as a Possible Differential Diagnosis.

Location Year Identified lesion Status
B. suis biovar 4 Serology
Ulukhaktok 1996 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Ulukhaktok 1996 Nephritis, splenitis, lymphadenitis Positive n/a
Ulukhaktok 1996 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Skin abscess Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Squamous cell carcinoma Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Lymphadenitis Positive Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Fat abscess Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 1998 Lymphadenitis Negative Negative1
Cambridge Bay 2014 Metatarsal abscess Positivea Positive2
Cambridge Bay 2016 Bilateral abscesses in the vagina Negative Negative2
Cambridge Bay 2016 Granulomatous mastitis, endometritis, lymphadenitis, nephritis Positive Positive2

Bacteriology status of muskoxen was determined by culturing tissues with identified lesions; while serology status of muskoxen was determined by BPAT on sera (1), A/G iELISA on paired sera and filter papers eluates (2), or was not available (n/a).

aTomaselli et al. (2016).