Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2019 Sep 2;28(11):2226–2232. doi: 10.1002/pon.5211

Table 2.

Comparison of Numerical Risk Estimation, Anxiety, and Breast Cancer Worry Before and After Risk Communication

Table 2a Low Anxiety subgroup vs. High Anxiety subgroup (Total Sample N=122; Lower Anxiety Subgroup N=100; High Anxiety Subgroup N=22)
Before Risk Communication After Risk communication P value
Numerical Risk Estimation, mean (SD)
 Overall 49.1% (24.6%) 41.9% (25.2%) <0.001
 Lower anxiety subgroup 47.6% (24.7%) 39.1% (25.0%) <0.001
 High anxiety subgroup 53.0% (24.4%) 52.5% (21.8%) 0.9
Anxiety, mean (SD)
 Overall 52.4 (8.2) 51.4 (8.8) 0.12
 Lower anxiety subgroup 50.0 (6.9) 49.6 (8.1) 0.6
 High anxiety subgroup 63.2 (3.4) 59.1 (7.3) 0.01
Breast cancer worry, median (IQR)
 Overall 7.0 (5–8) 6.0 (5–8) 0.01
 Lower anxiety subgroup 6.0 (5,7) 6.0 (5,7) 0.3
 High anxiety subgroup 9.0 (7,10) 7.0 (6,8) <0.001
Table 2b Accurate Estimate Subgroup vs. Over-estimated Subgroup. (Total Sample N=122; Accurate Estimate Subgroup N=34; Over-estimated Subgroup N=88)
Before Risk Communication After Risk communication P value
Numerical Risk Estimation, mean (SD)
 Accurate estimate subgroup 14.0% (11.2%) 16.2% (13.8%) 0.46
 Over-estimated subgroup 61.0% (16.1%) 50.0% (23.6%) <0.001
Anxiety, mean (SD)
 Accurate estimate subgroup 48.3 (7.4) 49.0 (8.2) 0.7
 Over-estimated subgroup 54.4 (7.5) 53.0 (8.9) 0.1
Breast cancer worry, median (IQR)
 Accurate estimate subgroup 6 (5,7) 6 (6,8) 1.0
 Over-estimated subgroup 7 (6,8) 7 (5,8) 0.09

SD = standard deviation, IQR=interquartile range