Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 27;20(12):1696–1709. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12871

Table 1.

Xanthomonas campestris  pv. campestris (Xcc) FabG1 and Xcc FabG3 activities with various 3‐oxoacyl‐APCs*

Substrate Xcc FabG1 (μmoles/mg/min) Xcc FabG3 (μmoles/mg/min)
3‐oxobutyryl ACP 14.69 ± 0.75 c 4.65 ± 0.44 c
3‐oxohexanoyl ACP 24.15 ± 2.06 a 8.10 ± 0.89 a
3‐oxoctanoyl ACP 22.31 ± 1.91 a 7.76 ± 0.97 b
3‐oxodecanoyl ACP 17.94 ± 1.68 b 8.53 ± 1.06 a
3‐oxododecanoyl ACP 17.21 ± 2.10 b 1.74 ± 0.11 d
*

The values are the means ± standard deviations of three independent experiments. The statistical analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel with P values between each pairwise comparison calculated by two‐tailed Student’s t‐tests. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05).