Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 18;15:136. doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0520-y

Table 2.

Comparison statistics on different constructed models using MLR, RBFNN and GEP techniques for PR, SL, STN, Vitri and QI of OHF and Pyrodwarf rootstocks during in vitro proliferation

Rootstock Measured parameter Model RMSE MARE MBE R2
OHF PR MLR 1.82 0.534 0.030 0.583
RBFNN 0.69 0.138 − 0.014 0.957
GEP 0.48 0.128 − 0.015 0.992
SL MLR 0.38 0.104 − 0.005 0.904
RBFNN 0.14 0.034 0.012 0.990
GEP 0.22 0.058 0.040 0.974
STN MLR 10.77 0.523 0.184 0.647
RBFNN 6.95 0.211 0.118 0.882
GEP 4.21 0.138 − 0.096 0.961
Vitri MLR 9.83 0.649 − 0.222 0.511
RBFNN 5.27 0.169 − 0.351 0.883
GEP 3.26 0.132 0.075 0.969
QI MLR 0.87 0.269 − 0.019 0.668
RBFNN 0.52 0.155 − 0.028 0.891
GEP 0.45 0.160 − 0.018 0.943
Pyrodwarf PR MLR 3.58 1.160 − 1.572 0.315
RBFNN 1.49 0.379 0.087 0.908
GEP 0.38 0.071 − 0.003 0.994
SL MLR 1.13 0.552 0.011 0.375
RBFNN 0.43 0.194 − 0.007 0.924
GEP 0.30 0.130 0.009 0.978
STN MLR 6.48 0.217 − 0.438 0.855
RBFNN 5.42 0.158 − 0.456 0.906
GEP 4.22 0.126 0.045 0.954
Vitri MLR 5.86 0.193 0.915 0.909
RBFNN 5.56 0.158 − 0.499 0.901
GEP 4.59 0.142 − 0.496 0.936
QI MLR 0.47 0.171 − 0.063 0.902
RBFNN 0.43 0.163 0.032 0.923
GEP 0.41 0.160 − 0.018 0.944