Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;120:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.025

Table 2.

Comparison of overall survival (OS) without or with VeriStrat status—when considering specific factors associated with poor prognosis and histology, all patients had active supportive care only.

Survival All patients (ignoring VeriStrat) VeriStrat Good VeriStrat Poor % with VeriStrat Good
Age ≥75 years (n = 143)
Median OS, months 4.3 [4.1] 5.6 3.4 58
1-year rate (95% CI) 19 (12–25) [17] 29 (19–38) [26] 5 (0–10)
2-year rate (95% CI) 5 (1–9) [4] 9 (3–15) [7] 0
ECOG 2–3 (n = 177)
Median OS, months 3.8 4.4 3.6 50
1-year rate 12 (7–17) 17 (9–25) 7 [1–12]
2-year rate 4 (1–7) 8 (2–14) [7] 0
Stage IV (n = 140)
Median OS, months 3.4 [3.3] 4.3 [4.1] 2.8 54
1-year rate 11 (6–16) [9] 18 (9–26) [15] 3 (0–7)
2-year rate 4 (1–7) [2] 7 (1–14) [4] 0
Adenocarcinoma (n = 77)
Median OS, months 4.1 [3.9] 5.6 3.6 60
1-year rate 11 (4–18) [9] 19 (7–30) [15] 0
2-year rate 5 (1–12) [3] 8 (1–16) [5] 0
Squamous cell (n = 95)
Median OS, months 4.6 5.3 [6.3] 4.2 [4.4] 43
1-year rate 22 (14–30) [20] 32 (17–46) 11 (3–19)
2-year rate 3 (0–7) [3] 7 (0–15) 0

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CI, confidence interval.

The aforementioned results were the same when patients with EGFR positive tumours were excluded, except where shown in square brackets.