Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Dec;87(12):1106–1123. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000450

Table 2.

Multivariate Meta-Regression Analysis for the Effects of SUD Interventions on Emotion Outcomes.

Moderators Coefficient p-value
Intercept 0.2565 0.6206
Treatment durationa −0.0050 0.4862
Main Intervention Type Q=8.71, df=3, p=0.0334*
Others (k=9) (reference)
Affect-regulation (k=6) 0.5217 0.0047**
Mindfulness-based (k=11) 0.3094 0.0340*
CBT (k=4) 0.0478 0.7958
Control Intervention Type Q=7.66, df=4, p=0.1049
Waitlist (k=1) (reference)
Active Comparator (k=2) −0.1302 0.7965
ST/TAU (k=12) −0.4153 0.3287
Non-specific component control (k=10) −0.4522 0.3070
Specific component control (k=5) −0.7704 0.0951
Substance Type Q=0.31, df=2, p=0.8572
Others/all (k=18) (reference)
Alcohol (k=5) 0.0909 0.5949
Nicotine (k=7) 0.0289 0.8033
Risk of Bias Q=0.70, df=2, p=0.7050
High (k=2) (reference)
Unclear (k=8) 0.2182 0.4407
Low (k=20) 0.2232 0.4090
*

p < 0.05

**

p<0.01

a

The unit of analysis for treatment duration is week.

Proportion of total between-study variance explained by the model: R2 analog=0.67