Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 11;12(4):768–777. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12207

Table 1.

Basic socio‐demographic characteristics of study subjects at baseline (June 2010) in Chi Linh district (intervention, n = 239) and Thanh Ha district (control, n = 230), Hai Duong Province, Viet Nam

Characteristics Study sites
Total Intervention Control P‐value
n (%) n (%)
Residency
Rural 351 (74.8) 152 (63.6) 199 (86.5)
Urban 118 (25.2) 87 (36.4) 31 (13.5) <0.001
Family type
Nuclear 204 (43.5) 103 (43.1) 101 (43.9)
Extended 265 (56.5) 136 (56.9) 129 (56.1) 0.86
Household economics
Non‐poor 407 (86.8) 208 (87.0) 199 (86.5)
Poor 65 (13.2) 31 (13.0) 31 (13.5) 0.93
Paternal employment
Farmer 113 (24.1) 60 (25.1) 53 (23.0)
Non‐farmer 356 (75.9) 179 (74.9) 177 (77.0) 0.60
Paternal education
Less than high school 236 (50.3) 116 (48.5) 120 (52.2)
High school and above 233 (49.7) 123 (51.5) 110 (47.8) 0.43
Economic role of father
Main income producer 341 (72.7) 173 (72.4) 168 (73.0)
Not a main producer 128 (27.3) 66 (27.6) 62 (27.0) 0.87
Paternal age 469 28.92 ± 5.11 29.41 ± 5.50 0.32
Maternal age 469 25.41 ± 4.39 25.46 ± 5.06 0.89
Maternal employment
Farmer 115 (24.5) 75 (31.4) 40 (17.4)
Non‐farmer 354 (75.5) 164 (68.6) 190 (82.6) <0.001
Maternal education
Less than high school 248 (52.9) 120 (50.2) 128 (55.7)
High school and above 221 (47.1) 119 (49.8) 102 (44.3) 0.24

Chi‐square tests applied to detect differences between intervention and control areas.