Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 11;11(Suppl 4):144–150. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12105

Table 4.

Comparison of energy and nutrient intake in the three trial arms (food supplements not included)

Outcome Results by study group Comparisons between CSB and control Comparisons between LNS and control
Control CSB LNS P * Difference (95% CI) P * Difference (95% CI) P *
Mean energy, kcal 548 (38) 366 (52) 596 (53) <0.001 −182 (−286 to −79) <0.001 48 (−58 to 158) 0.373
Mean protein, g 13.7 (1.0) 11.1 (1.7) 15.7 (1.5) 0.045 −2.6 (−6.0 to 0.8) 0.134 2.0 (−1.1 to 5.0) 0.206
Mean calcium, mg 136 (21) 155 (49) 172 (34) 0.580 18 (−78 to 115) 0.707 35 (−32 to 103) 0.301
Mean iron, mg 4.9 (0.3) 3.8 (0.6) 5.7 (0.6) 0.017 −1.1 (−2.3 to 0.1) 0.075 0.8 (−0.3 to 2.0) 0.138
Mean zinc, mg 4.7 (1.0) 4.2 (1.3) 6.5 (1.5) 0.228 −0.5 (−3.1 to 2.1) 0.689 1.8 (−1.1 to 4.7) 0.213
Vitamin A, μg 357 (61) 261 (75) 234 (74) 0.251 −96 (−245 to 52) 0.203 −123 (−270 to 0.24) 0.101
Vitamin C, mg 16 (2) 14 (3) 17 (4) 0.621 −2 (−7 to 3) 0.487 1.2 (−6 to 8) 0.733

*Huber–White Robust standard error. Differences are mean values in intervention group – mean value in control group. CI, confidence interval; CSB, corn–soy blend; LNS, lipid‐based nutrient supplement.