Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0225103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225103

Table 4. Results of the structural equation modelling analyses (N = 1019).

Model (Added) structural paths Standardised ß-coefficient Unstandardised B-coefficient (SE) –2LL(df) CFI NNFI RMSEA SRMR Compared model Δ–2LL(df)
1. Main effect model Dem. → Exh. .55*** 1.45(.25)***
Res. → Exh. –.24** –0.81(.24)**
EOE → Exh. .15* 0.39(.17)*
AES → Exh. –.14* –0.30(.13)*
LST → Exh. .07 0.15(.15)
Dem. → Help .69*** 0.72(.02)***
Res. → Help .49*** 0.66(.15)***
EOE → Help –.24** –0.26(.09)**
AES → Help .10 0.08(.07)
LST → Help .07 0.07(.08) 88842.14(117) .916 .906 .040 .040
2. Interaction model 1 (+) Dem. * EOE → Exh. na 0.60(.21)** 88830.48(118) na na na na Model 1 11.66(1)***
3. Interaction model 2 (+) Dem. * AES → Exh. na 0.15(.21) 88841.11(118) na na na na Model 1 1.03(1)
4. Interaction model 3 (+) Dem. * LST → Exh. na 0.62(.20)** 88828.16(118) na na na na Model 1 13.98(1)***
5. Interaction model 4 (+) Res. * EOE → Help na 0.24(.25) 88839.65(118) na na na na Model 1 2.49(1)
6. Interaction model 5 (+) Res. * AES → Help na –0.02(.15) 88842.10(118) na na na na Model 1 0.04(1)
7. Interaction model 6 (+) Res. * LST → Help na 0.38(.16)* 88830.72(118) na na na na Model 1 11.42(1)***

*p < .05

**p < .01

***p < .001.