Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 19;7(Suppl 3):19–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00350.x

Table 8.

Impacts of formulated protein‐energy drink

Author Site Study design Subjects Study group Control group Intake Outcome
Adair (Adair & Pollitt 1985) Taiwan, China Placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded RCT (multivitamin mineral supplements provided to both groups) Women 3 weeks after first birth through first lactation, second pregnancy and second lactation (15 months) Chocolate flavoured nutrient dense drink (400 kcal per serving) Placebo drink (3 kcal before 06/1971 and 43 kcal after, per serving) 17 oz Significantly heavier in post‐treatment than in pre‐treatment for male babies (3216 g vs. 3054 g); maternal haematocrits significantly greater (35.3% vs. 33%).
Kardjati (Kardjati et al. 1988) Indonesia RCT Women at 26–28 weeks of gestation High‐energy drink (465 kcal per serving) ‘jamu’ Low‐energy drink (52 kcal per serving, 6.2 g protein) 200 mL (465 kcal, 7.1 g protein) No significant effects
Rush (Rush et al. 1980) New York, USA RCT with stratification Women <30 weeks of gestation Fortified protein‐energy drink (473 kcal with 40 g casein) Low protein‐energy drink (322 kcal and 6 g casein) or MMN supplements 473 mL (326/470 kcal from the treatment, 233/322 kcal from the complement drink No significant effects on birthweight; for heavy smokers, supplements had effects to prevent birthweight deficit; high protein supplement significantly increased very early premature delivery and neonatal death (3.2% vs. 1.1%); and improved visual habituation, visual dishabituation, and the mean length of free play episodes

MMN, multiple micronutrient; RCT, randomized controlled trial.