Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 14;4(Suppl 1):24–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00124.x

Table 11.

Impact on morbidity outcomes of interventions in which provision of complementary food was combined with another strategy, usually education for mothers

Author Site Target group Study group n % diarrhoea % URI % LRI % fever Inc. of diarrhoea Inc. of URI Inc. of LRI Inc. of fever
Efficacy trials
Bhandari et al. (2001)* India 4 months Fortified food + education 87 12.7 7.1 0.79 6.3
Visitation 91 8.8 6.7 0.88 5.6
Diff: 3.9 PP Diff: +6.0% Diff: −10.2% Diff: +12.5%
Roy et al. (2005) Bangladesh 6–24 months Food + education 99 11 § 2 § 31 §
No intervention 90 10 3 19
Diff: +10.0% Diff: −33.3% Diff: +63.1%
Programmes
Schroeder et al. (2002) Vietnam 5–25 months Food + education 114 2 44
No intervention 118 2 54
Diff: 0 PP Diff: −10 PP

Diff, difference; Inc., incidence; LRI, lower respiratory infection; PP, percentage point; URI, upper respiratory infection. *Incidence values are number of episodes per child during follow‐up. Incidence values are number new episodes per 100 days at risk. Percentages are significantly different (P < 0.05) between intervention and control groups. §Significant difference observed during the first 2 months of the study.