Table 2.
Patient | Indication for surgery | Type of surgery | Preoperative | Last follow-up after surgery | Follow-up duration (months) | Clinical outcome | ||
UCVA | BSCVA | UCVA | BSCVA | |||||
1 | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 20/200 | 20/80 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
2 | Granular dystrophy | DALK | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/200 | 20/60* | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
3 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/240 | 20/60 | 20/40 | 20/20 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
4 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/1200 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/30 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
5 | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/30 | 20/20 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
6 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/1200 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/20 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
7 | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | CF | CF | 20/150 | 20/70† | 39 | Initially clear graft and epithelialised, developed infectious endophthalmitis 7 months after surgery. Underwent subsequent tectonic PK which failed within 1 year. |
8 | Limbal dermoid | ALK | 20/30 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
9 | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | CF | 20/200 | 20/30 | 20/30† | 84 | Initially clear graft and epithelialised, developed infectious endophthalmitis 4 months after surgery. Underwent subsequent tectonic PK which failed within 1 month, then repeat KPro which remained intact throughout follow-up. |
*Patient 2 had a recurrent presumed herpetic keratitis at month 6 and noted to have cataract at month 12.
†Visual acuity reported is from the last follow-up visit after surgery but before onset of infection.
ALK, anterior lamellar keratoplasty; BSCVA, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity; CF, count fingers; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; KPro, Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis; PK, penetrating keratoplasty; UCVA, uncorrected visual acuity.