Table 3.

Mean differences (95% CI) in functional measures (secondary outcomes) between intervention and control groups

Characteristic	Mean difference	95% CI	p value
TUG, s
Model 1	−1.14	−2.18, −0.10	0.032
Model 2	−1.02	−2.07, 0.02	0.054
FTSTS, s
Model 1	−1.31	−2.12, −0.51	0.001
Model 2	−1.21	−2.01, −0.42	0.003
Functional reach, cm
Model 1	0.50	−1.29, 2.28	0.585
Model 2	0.19	−1.59, 1.97	0.836
Total ABC score, %
Model 1	6.17	1.89, 10.44	0.005
Model 2	5.50	1.31, 9.68	0.010
Body sway velocity, eyes closed, mm/s
Model 1	0.17	−0.02, 0.36	0.087
Model 2	0.19	−0.01, 0.39	0.065
Muscle strength, right ankle, N
Model 1	4.18	0.4, 7.92	0.031
Model 2	3.69	0.00003, 7.43	0.050
Range of motion, right ankle,
Model 1	−3.17	−5.75, −0.58	0.016
Model 2	−3.20	−5.83, −0.57	0.017
Range of motion, right knee,
Model 1	6.82	2.87, 10.78	0.001
Model 2	6.48	2.38, 10.59	0.002

Model 1 was a random intercept mixed model with intervention and one pre-measurement; model 2 was a random intercept mixed model, adjusted for time, baseline covariate and sex