Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;10:1106. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01106

Table 1.

Comparison of different predictive scoring models*.

Name Study type Study population Index event Outcome Validation studies Clinical utility and potential limitations
Stroke Prognosis Instrument (SPI-I) Retrospective cohort (3) 142 patients, identified on a carotid ultrasound roster First-time carotid TIA or minor stroke Stroke or death within 2 years 2/2 Limited. Overestimates in low-risk patients; followed by SPI-II
SPI-II Prospective cohort (4) 525 patients, WEST cohort First-time carotid territory TIA or non-disabling stroke Stroke or death within 2 years 4/4 Limited for early prediction. Overestimates in low-risk patients; carotid territory TIA or minor stroke only, Overall limited performance
Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) Prospective cohort (5) 6,431 patients, ischemic stroke subgroup of CAPRIE trial Ischemic stroke Recurrent stroke within 1 year 7/9 Limited for early prediction. Perform better for combined recurrent stroke and death, Overall limited performance
Recurrence Risk Estimator at 90 days (RRE-90) Retrospective cohort (6) 1,458 patients, consecutive patients with ischemic stroke admitted to a single center Ischemic stroke Recurrent stroke within 90-days 4/4 Web-based prognostic tool. Limited use as it requires both accurate subtyping and neuroradiological assessment
Dutch TIA Prospective cohort (7) 997 patients with TIA and 2,130 patients with minor stroke TIA or minor stroke Fatal or non-fatal stroke and for MI, stroke, or vascular death at 2 years 0/2 Overestimate the risk, Lacking validation
LiLAC Prospective cohort (8) 2,473 participants of the Dutch TIA Trial TIA or minor stroke All-cause mortality and the composite event of death from all vascular causes, non-fatal stroke, and non-fatal MI at 10 years 0/1 Lacking validation
Hankey Score Prospective cohort (9) 469 patients TIA Stroke; coronary event; and stroke, MI or vascular death within 5 years 3/4 Poor performance in validation studies involves complex equations limiting its clinical utility
California Risk Score Retrospective cohort (10) 1,707 patients TIA Recurrent stroke at 90 days 2/2 Followed by ABCD2
ABCD Prospective (population-based) cohort (11) 209 Patients Probable or definite TIA Stroke within 7 days 9/12 Followed by ABCD2
ABCD2 Derived from California risk score and ABCD and validated on the derivation cohort of these scores (12) 1,707 and 209 patients TIA Stroke at 2, 7, and 90 days 20/32 Most widely used for prediction of short-term risk of stroke, Questionable predictive value might underestimate the risk
*

Predictive scoring models derived from ABCD/ABCD2 are described in Table 5.