Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;44(4):233–241. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D19-037

Table 1. Effect of phenyl substituents on apical hook development of Arabidopsis seedlings.

graphic file with name jps-44-4-D19-037-table01.jpg
Comp. No. R Curvature of the hook (Degree)
10 (μM) 100 (μM)
C1 2-Fluoro 42±2 72±10
C2 3-Fluoro 53±10 85±19
C3 4-Fluoro 46±9 95±21
C4 2,4-Difluoro 42±6 59±13
C5 3,4-Difluoro 39±14 123±21
C6 2,4,5-Trifluoro 60±21 84±16
C7 3-Chloro-2-fluoro 54±8 106±32
C8 3-Chloro-4-fluoro 58±7 223±35
C9 4-Chloro-3-trifluoromethyl 83±22 203±22
C10 5-Chloro-2-methoxy 68±10 142±36
C11 4-Methyl 75±8 115±26
C12 4-Ethyl 153±17 184±26
C13 4-Propyl 153±10 199±39
C14 4-tert-Butyl 70±8 220±16
C15 4-Phenyl 53±7 193±25
C16 2,5-Dimethyl 68±16 108±17
C17 2,4,6-Trimethyl 115±19 135±33
C18 4-Methoxy 72±7 120±28
C19 4-Isopropoxy 77±8 179±30
C20 4-Trifluoromethyl 74±21 195±52
C21 2-Trifluoromethyl 92±17 190±25
C22 2,4,5-Trichloro 95±14 223±20
C23 4-Bromo-2,5-difluoro 106±35 213±18
C24 4-Phenylazo 124±15 166±20
EH-8 3,4-Dichloro 185±14 275±32
Ethephone 128±10 209±16
Control 38±9

Data are the means±S.E. obtained from 11 to 15 plants. All the experiments were done three times to establish the repeatability.