TABLE 4.

Non-words post hoc comparisons on the raw data using Tukey correction.

	Contrast	Estimate	SE	t ratio	p value
1	3,TDR – 4,TDR	–19.98	35.77	–0.56	0.999
2	3,TDR – 5,TDR	–29.27	35.82	–0.82	0.992
3	3,TDR – 6,TDR	–38.17	35.78	–1.07	0.962
4	3,TDR – 3,DD	–299.85	123.35	–2.43	0.257
5	3,TDR – 4,DD	–377.27	125.21	–3.01	0.078
6	3,TDR – 5,DD	–551.27	125.31	–4.40	0.002
7	3,TDR – 6,DD	–573.52	125.19	–4.58	0.001
8	4,TDR – 5,TDR	–9.30	35.72	–0.26	1.000
9	4,TDR – 6,TDR	–18.19	35.68	–0.51	1.000
10	4,TDR – 3,DD	–279.87	125.17	–2.24	0.354
11	4,TDR – 4,DD	–357.29	123.36	–2.90	0.102
12	4,TDR – 5,DD	–531.29	125.28	–4.24	0.003
13	4,TDR – 6,DD	–553.54	125.16	–4.42	0.002
14	5,TDR – 6,TDR	–8.90	35.73	–0.25	1.000
15	5,TDR – 3,DD	–270.58	125.18	–2.16	0.396
16	5,TDR – 4,DD	–347.99	125.20	–2.78	0.130
17	5,TDR – 5,DD	–522.00	123.46	–4.23	0.003
18	5,TDR – 6,DD	–544.24	125.18	–4.35	0.002
19	6,TDR – 3,DD	–261.68	125.17	–2.09	0.438
20	6,TDR – 4,DD	–339.09	125.19	–2.71	0.150
21	6,TDR – 5,DD	–513.10	125.29	–4.10	0.005
22	6,TDR – 6,DD	–535.34	123.34	–4.34	0.002
23	3,DD – 4,DD	–77.41	36.68	–2.11	0.413
24	3,DD – 5,DD	–251.42	36.99	–6.80	0.000
25	3,DD – 6,DD	–273.66	36.59	–7.48	0.000
26	4,DD – 5,DD	–174.01	37.05	–4.70	0.000
27	4,DD – 6,DD	–196.25	36.65	–5.35	0.000
28	5,DD – 6,DD	–22.24	36.95	–0.60	0.999

TDR, typically developing readers and DD, developmental dyslexics.