Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;10:2543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02543

TABLE 3.

Correlation matrix for study variables.

Variables CAR BPN Athletic satisfaction



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Closeness 0.49 0.42 0.21 0.12 0.15 0.24 0.43 0.47
2. Commitment 0.43 0.53 0.30 0.37 0.22 0.43 0.40 0.53
3. Complementarity 0.55 0.55 0.43 0.41 0.34 0.40 0.36 0.35
4. Competence 0.19 0.27 0.30 0.52 0.43 0.57 0.31 0.33
5. Autonomy 0.27 0.34 0.33 0.40 0.32 0.42 0.39 0.46
6. Relatedness 0.23 0.32 0.29 0.17 0.25 0.28 0.17 0.31
7. Training-instruction 0.42 0.42 0.46 0.25 0.25 0.32 0.63 0.51
8. Individual performance 0.24 0.36 0.29 0.35 0.28 0.22 0.48 0.52
9. Personal treatment 0.45 0.50 0.52 0.36 0.30 0.25 0.55 0.43

Pearson correlations, significant values for p < 0.05. Upper triangle (Correlation coefficients for coaches) – Lower triangle (Correlation coefficients for athletes). CART (1. Closeness; 2.Commitment; 3. Complementarity); BPN (4. Competence; 5. Autonomy; 6. Relatedness); ST (7. Training-instruction; 8. Individual performance; 9. Personal treatment). CAR: coach-athlete relationship subscales; BPN: Basic Psychological needs subscale. Source: the authors. Bold values correspond to statistically significant correlations between variables.