Table I.
Student’s perception of FCR Strategy.
| Agree | No Opinion | Disagree | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placement shock FCR schedule was appropriate | 38 | 1 | 1 |
| Clear instructions provided | 40 | - | - |
| Preparation material helpful for NF2F | 38 | 2 | - |
| Preparation material given well ahead of time | 37 | 3 | - |
| Learning objectives were well defined | 40 | - | - |
| Learner activated prior knowledge elaborate FCR | 39 | 1 | - |
| Learner developed competence self-directed learning | 38 | 1 | 1 |
| NF2F enable learner to be self-directed | 35 | 5 | - |
| NF2F enhanced ability information using internet library | 34 | 6 | - |
| F2F enhanced ability speak front of peers | 39 | 1 | - |
| Critical reasoning skills developed F2F | 40 | - | - |