Table 5.
WMH challenge results. The average performance of SegAE on each of the metrics of the WMH challenge on test data from each scanner, and the weighted average of the scores achieved on images from each scanner type for each metric.2.f.
| DSC | H95 | AVD | L-TPR | L-F1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utrecht (n=30) | 0.57 | 31.57 | 79.90 | 0.35 | 0.30 |
| Singapore (n=30) | 0.67 | 17.70 | 16.61 | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| AMS GE3T (n=30) | 0.65 | 16.56 | 22.41 | 0.39 | 0.48 |
| AMS GE1.5T (n=10) | 0.64 | 17.04 | 17.76 | 0.31 | 0.44 |
| AMS PETMR (n=10) | 0.53 | 54.87 | 111.59 | 0.40 | 0.23 |
| Weighted average | 0.62 | 24.49 | 44.19 | 0.33 | 0.36 |