Table 4.
Within-Network Optimality Regression Analyses: Default Network.
| β | Std. Err. | t | p | pcorrected† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 1.31, p = 0.250 | ||||||
| PCL-R | 0.062 | 0.037 | 1.69 | 0.092 | 0.276 | |
| SUD | −0.028 | 0.037 | −0.75 | 0.455 | 1.000 | |
| Age | 0.054 | 0.036 | 1.50 | 0.133 | 0.399 | |
| Race | −0.034 | 0.038 | −0.89 | 0.376 | 1.000 | |
| IQ | 0.011 | 0.038 | 0.30 | 0.767 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | −0.046 | 0.037 | −1.23 | 0.219 | 0.657 | |
| Constant | 0.016 | 0.036 | 0.45 | 0.653 | 1.000 | |
| Vulnerability Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 2.37, p = 0.028 | ||||||
| PCL-R | −0.076 | 0.036 | −2.13 | 0.033 | 0.099 | |
| SUD | −0.028 | 0.036 | −0.77 | 0.444 | 1.000 | |
| Age | −0.072 | 0.035 | −2.02 | 0.043 | 0.129 | |
| Race | −0.058 | 0.037 | −1.55 | 0.121 | 0.363 | |
| IQ | −0.021 | 0.037 | −0.56 | 0.576 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | 0.074 | 0.036 | 2.05 | 0.041 | 0.123 | |
| Constant | 0.011 | 0.035 | 0.31 | 0.758 | 1.000 | |
| Hubness Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 1.83, p = 0.090 | ||||||
| PCL-R | 0.064 | 0.036 | 1.77 | 0.078 | 0.234 | |
| SUD | −0.052 | 0.037 | −1.43 | 0.154 | 0.462 | |
| Age | 0.019 | 0.036 | 0.54 | 0.590 | 1.000 | |
| Race | −0.055 | 0.038 | −1.46 | 0.144 | 0.432 | |
| IQ | 0.035 | 0.038 | 0.92 | 0.357 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | −0.044 | 0.036 | −1.21 | 0.227 | 0.681 | |
| Constant | −0.026 | 0.035 | −0.74 | 0.462 | 1.000 | |
β-values were corrected for the three comparisons in the default network within-network optimality analysis.