Table 6.
Within-Network Optimality Regression Analyses: Dorsal Attention Network.
| β | Std. Err. | t | p | pcorrected† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 2.52, p = 0.020 | ||||||
| PCL-R | 0.101* | 0.037 | 2.75 | 0.006 | 0.018 | |
| SUD | −0.111* | 0.038 | −2.98 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |
| Age | 0.014 | 0.036 | 0.39 | 0.693 | 1.000 | |
| Race | 0.020 | 0.038 | 0.51 | 0.607 | 1.000 | |
| IQ | −0.011 | 0.038 | −0.27 | 0.784 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | 0.009 | 0.037 | 0.25 | 0.802 | 1.000 | |
| Constant | 0.014 | 0.036 | 0.39 | 0.696 | 1.000 | |
| Vulnerability Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 0.83, p = 0.544 | ||||||
| PCL-R | −0.004 | 0.033 | −0.12 | 0.905 | 1.000 | |
| SUD | −0.010 | 0.034 | −0.28 | 0.776 | 1.000 | |
| Age | 0.029 | 0.033 | 0.90 | 0.367 | 1.000 | |
| Race | −0.063 | 0.035 | −1.82 | 0.069 | 0.207 | |
| IQ | −0.029 | 0.035 | −0.83 | 0.408 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | 0.029 | 0.034 | 0.88 | 0.377 | 1.000 | |
| Constant | 0.020 | 0.033 | 0.62 | 0.533 | 1.000 | |
| Hubness Factor | ||||||
| Overall model: F(6,840) = 1.96, p = 0.069 | ||||||
| PCL-R | 0.056 | 0.039 | 1.46 | 0.146 | 0.438 | |
| SUD | −0.091 | 0.039 | −2.32 | 0.020 | 0.060 | |
| Age | 0.044 | 0.038 | 1.16 | 0.248 | 0.744 | |
| Race | −0.075 | 0.040 | −1.85 | 0.065 | 0.195 | |
| IQ | −0.028 | 0.040 | −0.69 | 0.488 | 1.000 | |
| TBIs | −0.011 | 0.039 | −0.27 | 0.788 | 1.000 | |
| Constant | −0.036 | 0.038 | −0.95 | 0.343 | 1.000 | |
β-values were corrected for the three comparisons in the dorsal attention network within-network optimality analysis.
p < 0.05 Bonferroni corrected.