Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 9;24:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102083

Table 6.

Within-Network Optimality Regression Analyses: Dorsal Attention Network.

β Std. Err. t p pcorrected
Efficiency Factor
Overall model: F(6,840) = 2.52, p = 0.020
PCL-R 0.101* 0.037 2.75 0.006 0.018
SUD −0.111* 0.038 −2.98 0.003 0.009
Age 0.014 0.036 0.39 0.693 1.000
Race 0.020 0.038 0.51 0.607 1.000
IQ −0.011 0.038 −0.27 0.784 1.000
TBIs 0.009 0.037 0.25 0.802 1.000
Constant 0.014 0.036 0.39 0.696 1.000
Vulnerability Factor
Overall model: F(6,840) = 0.83, p = 0.544
PCL-R −0.004 0.033 −0.12 0.905 1.000
SUD −0.010 0.034 −0.28 0.776 1.000
Age 0.029 0.033 0.90 0.367 1.000
Race −0.063 0.035 −1.82 0.069 0.207
IQ −0.029 0.035 −0.83 0.408 1.000
TBIs 0.029 0.034 0.88 0.377 1.000
Constant 0.020 0.033 0.62 0.533 1.000
Hubness Factor
Overall model: F(6,840) = 1.96, p = 0.069
PCL-R 0.056 0.039 1.46 0.146 0.438
SUD −0.091 0.039 −2.32 0.020 0.060
Age 0.044 0.038 1.16 0.248 0.744
Race −0.075 0.040 −1.85 0.065 0.195
IQ −0.028 0.040 −0.69 0.488 1.000
TBIs −0.011 0.039 −0.27 0.788 1.000
Constant −0.036 0.038 −0.95 0.343 1.000

β-values were corrected for the three comparisons in the dorsal attention network within-network optimality analysis.

p < 0.05 Bonferroni corrected.