Table 2.
Results of regression analyses examining the relationships between romantic relationship status (single vs in love) and hormone levels, controlling for age and BMI (N = 116).
Dependent Variable | Predictors | Β | t (112) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1: R2 = 0.006, F (3,112) = 0.22, p = 0.88 | ||||
E2 | Love status 1 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.66 |
Age | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.72 | |
BMI | −0.05 | −0.53 | 0.60 | |
Model 2: R2 = 0.06, F (3,112) = 2.23, p = 0.09 | ||||
FSH | Love status 1 | 0.17 | 1.81 | 0.07 |
Age | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.56 | |
BMI | −0.14 | −1.51 | 0.13 | |
Model 3: R2 = 0.07, F (3,112) = 2.72, p = 0.048 | ||||
LH | Love status 1 | 0.20 | 2.15 | 0.03 |
Age | 0.08 | 0.85 | 0.40 | |
BMI | −0.13 | −1.37 | 0.17 | |
Model 4: R2 = 0.02, F (3,112) = 0.88, p = 0.45 | ||||
PRL | Love status1 | −0.04 | −0.45 | 0.65 |
Age | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.72 | |
BMI | −0.15 | −1.60 | 0.11 | |
Model 5: R2 = 0.08, F (3,112) = 0.33, p = 0.02 | ||||
E2/T | Love status 1 | 0.18 | 1.90 | 0.06 |
Age | 0.06 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
BMI | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.54 | |
Model 6: R2 = 0.02, F (3,112) = 0.88, p = 0.45 | ||||
fT | Love status 1 | −0.24 | −2.68 | 0.008 |
Age | −0.05 | −0.53 | 0.60 | |
BMI | −0.16 | −1.75 | 0.08 | |
Model 7: R2 = 0.02, F (3,112) = 0.88, p = 0.45 | ||||
CT | Love status 1 | −0.15 | −1.63 | 0.10 |
Age | −0.10 | −1.11 | 0.27 | |
BMI | −0.14 | −1.49 | 0.14 |
1 Coded as single = 0, in love = 1.