Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 26;16(21):4128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214128

Table 7.

Summary of concurrent validity of GPAQ with PA log and IPAQ in various countries.

Country
(1st Author, Year)
Sample Size Criterion Measures GPAQ Measures
Sitting MPA VPA MVPA
China (Hu et al. 2015 [11]) 205 aged 30–70 years, 38.54% of males PA log r = 0.52 ** r = 0.47 **;
0.43 ** (MPA excluding walking)
r = 0.41 ** r = 0.51 **
India (Misra et al. 2014 [36]) 262 aged 15–65 years, 116 males (49.6%) IPAQ r = 0.999 *** r = 0.894 *** r = 0.934 *** r = 0.939 ***
Malaysia (Lingesh et al. 2016 [9]) 43 female nurses
aged 24 to 55 years
(44.48 ± 8.38 years)
PA Log r = −0.015
IPAQ r = 0.214
Malaysia (Soo et al. 2015 [37]) 100 aged 20–58 years IPAQ r = 0.447 *** r = 0.459 *** r = 0.466 *** r = 0.309 **
Vietnam (Thuy et al. 2010 [22]) 251 (120 men and 118 women) PA Log r = 0.49 (men), −0.05 (women)
IPAQ r = 0.39 (men), 0.18 (women)
By work pattern: 146 with stable and 92 with unstable work patterns PA Log r = 0.31 (stable)
IPAQ r = 0.32 (stable)
Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Japan, Portugal, and South Africa (Bull et al. 2009 [1]) 2657 male and female adults from nine countries; n = 1951 for criterion validity IPAQ r = 0.65 **; poor agreement in categorizing inactive time, agreement = 85.2%, k = 0.22 r = 0.45 ** r = 0.57 ** r = 0.54 **

Note: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; MPA = moderate physical activity; VPA = vigorous physical activity.