Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 30;16(21):4205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214205

Table 5.

ANCOVA adjustments for the secondary outcomes on HIICT, MICT and CG.

Group n (ITT) n (Treated) Increment ANCOVA Interactions (F, p, ES η²)
Mean SD Training × Group Training × Baseline Training × Age
F p ES η² F p ES η² F p ES η²
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
CG 18 12 0.30 −0.05 6.99 0.002 2 0.215 3.02 0.088 0.046 0.217 0.643 0.003
MICT 18 12 −0.10 1.47
HIICT 18 17 −0.30 0.47
Right Handgrip Strength (kg)
CG 18 12 0.60 −0.86 0.881 0.420 0.033 9.72 3.02 × 10−3 0.155 1.45 0.233 0.028
MICT 18 12 −0.40 0.49
HIICT 18 17 0.60 −0.68
Left Handgrip Strength (kg)
CG 18 12 0.90 0.04 1.46 0.243 0.054 1.39 0.244 0.026 1.13 0.293 0.021
MICT 18 12 −0.20 0.74
HIICT 18 17 0.60 0.87
Heart Rate during 6-Minute Walking Test (bpm)
CG 18 12 −3 −9.50 1 0.375 0.038 13.39 6.08 × 10−4 0.197 1.74 0.193 0.032
MICT 18 12 2 0.30
HIICT 18 17 6 33.90

ITT—Intention to treat; SD—Standard deviation; ANCOVA—Covariance analysis; F—estimated variance; CG—Control Group; MICT—Moderate-Intensity Circuit Training; HIICT—High-Intensity Interval Circuit Training. 2 Denotes significant differences in HIICT compared to CG; Statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 are given in bold.