Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;50(3):583–592. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00094-2

Table 1.

Mycelial radial growth of F. solani and F. oxysporum confronted with the rhizobacterial isolates that were able to reduce fungal growth by more than 20% in direct antagonism assays

Bacterial isolate Mycelial radial growth of F. solani (cm) Mycelial radial growth of F. oxysporum (cm)
Treatment Control Treatment Control
INECOL-8 2.53 ± 0.40† 3.15 ± 0.13 3.35 ± 0.13 3.48 ± 0.21
INECOL-11 2.20 ± 0.22* 2.83 ± 0.24 3.28 ± 0.10 3.58 ± 0.15
INECOL-19 2.10 ± 0.22* 2.60 ± 0.25 3.20 ± 0.16* 3.50 ± 0.14
INECOL-21 2.43 ± 0.10* 3.35 ± 0.37 3.38 ± 0.17 3.65 ± 0.17
INECOL-27 2.18 ± 0.17† 3.08 ± 0.15 3.20 ± 0.14* 3.48 ± 0.15
INECOL-57 1.83 ± 0.05† 2.50 ± 0.36 3.20 ± 0.18 3.45 ± 0.10
INECOL-65.1 2.25 ± 0.13* 2.78 ± 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00† 2.48 ± 0.05
INECOL-65.2 2.18 ± 0.05* 2.73 ± 0.05 1.98 ± 0.10* 2.35 ± 0.13
INECOL-100 2.28 ± 0.30* 3.10 ± 0.22 3.05 ± 0.13* 3.40 ± 0.14

Values represent the average of four replicates ± standard error. Italicized values show significant differences between the treatment and its respective control

*P ≤ 0.05, Student’s t test (normal distribution)

P ≤ 0.05, the Mann–Whitney U test (non-parametric distribution)