Table 6.

Graft type in patients with generalised joint hypermobility

	Authors	Test	Follow-up time, mean years (minimum)	Result sorted by graft type			P value
				Double-bundle QT	PT autograft	HT autograft
Knee laxity tests	Kim et al43	Lachman test (% with 0, 1, 2, 3)	2*	69, 31, 0, 0	38, 56, 6, 0		0.032
	Kim et al44		2 (2)*		40, 50, 10, 0	27, 46, 27, 0	0.024
	Kim et al41		2 (2)*		66, 27, 7, 0	52, 33, 14, 0	NS
			5*		55, 33, 9, 3	35, 47, 18, 0	NS
	Kim et al43	Pivot shift test (% with 0, 1, 2, 3)	2*	100, 0, 0, 0	91, 9, 0, 0		NS
	Kim et al44		2 (2)*		95, 5, 0, 0	82, 9, 9, 0	0.013
	Kim et al41		2 (2)*		73, 20, 7, 0	62, 29, 10, 0	NS
			5*		58, 30, 12, 0	50, 39, 11, 0	NS
								Kim et al43	KT-2000 mean SSD±SD	2*	2.03±1.11	3.37±1.8		0.02
								Kim et al44		2 (2)*		3.4±1.5	4.5±2.0	0.036
	Kim et al41	2 (2)*		2.7±1.4	3.5±1.4	0.043
		5*		3.2±1.8	4.4±1.8	0.034
	Kim et al30	2 (2)*		3.44±1.2	4.64±1.3	†
	Patient-reported outcome	Kim et al43	Lysholm score mean±SD	2*	91.1±6.8	89.4±7.3		NS
		Kim et al44		2 (2)*		89±7	79±12	0.015
Kim et al41		2 (2)*			88.8±4.9	84.1±3.6	0.004
		5*			86.6±6.1	81.2±4.2	0.005
Kim et al43		HSS mean±SD	2*	92.1±6.1	90.8±6.7		NS
Kim et al44		IKDC (% with A, B, C, D)	2 (2)*		15, 65, 10, 10	18, 46, 9, 27	†
Kim et al41		IKDC subjective score	2 (2)*		86.3±8.8	81.1±3.5	0.013
			5*		82.4±10.3	79.2±4.7	0.005
Radiography		IKDC radiographic grade (% with A, B, C, D)	2 (2)*		93, 7, 0, 0	95, 5, 0, 0	NS
			5*		73, 24, 3, 0	67, 28, 6, 0	NS

All patients in the diagram have been determined as hypermobile by the corresponding authors.

*The exact follow-up time was not disclosed.

†No statistical analysis performed.

HSS, Hospital for Special Surgery Score; HT, hamstring tendon; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; NS, not significant; PT, patellar tendon; QT, quadriceps tendon; SSD, side-to-side difference.