Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;5:43. doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0134-6

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of study participants from the BREAST-Stamp Project, who were referred for an image-guided breast biopsy, stratified by the training and testing sets (n = 852)

Characteristic Overall (N = 852) Training (N = 588) Testing (N = 264) P-value*
n % n % n %
Age at ipsilateral mammogram (years) 0.85
 <45 175 20.5 119 20.2 56 21.2
 45–49 217 25.5 152 25.9 65 24.6
 50–54 202 23.7 142 24.2 60 22.7
 55–59 145 17.0 95 16.2 50 18.9
 60+ 113 13.3 80 13.6 33 12.5
 Mean (SD) 50.8 (6.9) 50.8 (6.9) 50.7 (6.8) 0.91**
Race 0.81
 White, non Hispanic 778 91.3 536 91.2 242 91.7
 Other 74 8.7 52 8.8 22 8.3
Education level 0.70
 <High school 14 1.7 9 1.6 5 2.0
 High school graduation 132 16.0 95 16.7 37 14.6
 College/graduation school degree 678 82.3 466 81.8 212 83.5
BMI (kg/m2) 0.22
 <25 427 50.4 283 48.4 144 54.8
 25-<30 212 25.0 153 26.2 59 22.4
 30+ 209 24.7 149 25.5 60 22.8
 Mean (SD) 26.7 (6.3) 26.8 (6.2) 26.6 (6.5) 0.43†
Age at menarche (years) 0.41
 ≤12 326 38.9 216 37.2 110 42.8
 13 322 38.4 233 40.1 89 34.6
 14 114 13.6 80 13.8 34 13.2
 15+ 76 9.1 52 9.0 24 9.3
Age at first birth (years) 0.54
 Nulliparous 189 22.3 134 22.9 55 21.2
 <25 269 31.8 193 32.9 76 29.2
 25–30 202 23.9 135 23.0 67 25.8
 30+ 186 22.0 124 21.2 62 23.9
Menopausal status 0.89
 Premenopausal 472 58.1 326 58.2 146 57.7
 Postmenopausal 341 41.9 234 41.8 107 42.3
Menopausal hormone therapy use 0.88
 Never 719 86.1 497 86.0 222 86.4
 Ever 116 13.9 81 14.0 35 13.6
First degree family history of breast cancer 0.45
 0 636 77.0 439 77.6 197 75.8
 1 167 20.2 114 20.1 53 20.4
 2+ 23 2.8 13 2.3 10 3.9
Breast biopsy prior to enrollment 0.54
 No 580 68.9 404 69.5 176 67.4
 Yes 262 31.1 177 30.5 85 32.6
Global FGV (%)c 0.55
 ≤34.4 (%) 439 51.5 307 52.2 132 50.0
 >34.4 (%) 413 48.5 281 47.8 132 50.0
 Median (Range) 34.4 (0.6, 99.5) 34.4 (0.6, 99.5) 36.2, (1.4, 99.3)
Localized FGV (%)c 0.21
 ≤40 (%) 406 50.7 289 52.2 117 47.4
 >40 (%) 395 49.3 265 47.8 130 52.6
 Median (Range) 40.0 (0, 100) 39.8 (0, 100) 43.3 (0, 100)
Biopsy type 0.82b
 Ultrasound-guided (14-guage) 445 52.2 309 52.6 136 51.5
 Stereotactic-guided (9-guage) 406 47.7 279 47.5 127 48.1
 Both 1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.4
BI-RADS mammography assessment 0.89
 Probably benign finding 47 5.9 32 5.8 15 6.1
 Suspicious abnormality 670 83.7 463 83.4 207 84.2
 Highly suggestive of malignancy 84 10.5 60 10.8 24 9.8
Pathologic diagnosisa# 0.23
 Benign non-proliferative 282 33.1 190 32.3 92 34.9
 Proliferative without atypia 316 37.1 215 36.6 101 38.3
 Proliferative with atypia 57 6.7 44 7.5 13 4.9
 In-situ (LCIS or DCIS) 76 8.9 48 8.2 28 10.6
 Invasive breast cancer 121 14.2 91 15.5 30 11.4
Characteristic (per biopsy target, n = 1036 biopsies)
 Biopsy type 0.63b
 Ultrasound-guided (14-guage) 566 54.6 372 54.2 194 55.6
 Stereotactic-guided (9-guage) 469 45.3 315 45.9 154 44.1
 Both 1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.3
Pathologic diagnosis# 0.39
 Benign non-proliferative 373 36.0 242 35.2 131 37.5
 Proliferative without atypia 369 35.6 242 35.2 127 36.4
 Proliferative with atypia 68 6.6 52 7.6 16 4.6
 In-situ (LCIS or DCIS) 83 8.0 53 7.7 30 8.6
 Invasive breast cancer 143 13.8 98 14.3 45 12.9

BMI body mass index, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, FGV fibroglandular volume, LCIS lobular carcinoma in situ, SD standard deviation

Missing data were excluded from percentage calculations and statistical comparisons: 28 for education levels, 4 BMI, 14 age at menarche, 6 age at first birth, 39 menopausal status, 17 menopausal hormone therapy use, 26 first degree family history of breast cancer, 10 breast biopsy prior to enrollment, 51 percent volumetric local density (biopsy radius 0–2 mm), 51 BI-RADS mammography assessment

*P-values from Chi-Square test except where noted

**P-value from two-sample t-test

P-values from Kruskal–Wallis test

aAmong women with multiple biopsies, this was the worst pathologic diagnosis

bOne woman from the test group who had both biopsy types was excluded from the Chi-square test

cThe median cut points of breast density were determined among the training population and were consistent among all 852 women

#Benign non-proliferative diagnosis includes non-proliferative fibrocystic change and other benign and discrete entities; Proliferative without atypia includes ductal hyperplasia and sclerosing adensosis; Proliferative with atypia includes atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasia