Table 2.
Gold Standard vs. VERDICT Concordance for Synthetic Use Cases (N=45), CL=confidence limit.
| Measure | Description | Lin’s Concordance Correlation |
Lower 95% CL |
Upper 95% CL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMFS | Number of decayed, missing, or filled permanent tooth surfaces | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| DMFT | Number of decayed, missing, or filled permanent teeth | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.98 |
| DS | Number of decayed permanent tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| DT | Number of decayed permanent teeth | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| FS | Number of filled permanent tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| FT | Number of filled permanent teeth | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| MS | Number of missing permanent tooth surfaces | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| MT | Number of missing permanent teeth | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.96 |
| dmfs | Number of decayed, missing, or filled primary tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| dmft | Number of decayed, missing, or filled primary teeth | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| ds | Number of decayed primary tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| dt | Number of decayed primary teeth | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| fs | Number of filled primary tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| ft | Number of filled primary teeth | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| ms | Number of missing primary tooth surfaces | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| mt | Number of missing primary teeth | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |