Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD012155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012155.pub2

Comparison 4. Oral hygiene, diet and feeding practice advice versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Caries presence in primary teeth 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Caries presence in any teeth 2 365 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.75, 1.10]
1.2 Caries presence in top font four teeth only 1 226 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.42, 1.10]
2 dmfs index 1 187 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.99 [‐2.45, 0.47]
3 dmft index 1 187 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.30 [‐0.96, 0.36]
4 SiC30 index 1 187 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.93 [‐1.73, ‐0.13]
5 Child oral health behaviours     Other data No numeric data
6 Child dental attendance     Other data No numeric data
7 Change in mother self‐reported oral health behaviours (including diet) and attitudes     Other data No numeric data
8 Adverse events for mother or child     Other data No numeric data