Child oral health behaviours
Study	Behaviour changes associated with the intervention	Assessment time period	Benefit in favour of intervention	Benefit in favour of control
Feldens 2007	"The intervention group had significantly longer duration of exclusive breast feeding (P ¼ 0.000), later introduction of sugar (P = 0.005), and smaller probability of ever having eaten biscuits (P = 0.000), honey (P = 0.003), soft drinks (P = 0.02), fromage‐frais (P = 0.001), chocolate and sweets (P = 0.001)" (Feldens 2007, p.215).	Four‐year follow‐up, children 4‐5 years of age	Some	No
Watt 2009	"Frequency of consumption for milk and water was similar in both groups. More intervention group children drank pure, unsweetened fruit juice on a daily basis compared with the control group (RR = 1.57; 95% CI 0.99, 2.49). It was also more likely for intervention group children never to be given squash (RR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.20, 2.58). Daily consumption of tea, fizzy drinks or ready‐to‐drink soft drinks was rare in both groups (results not shown). Outcomes relating to drinking utensils and habits were consistently more favourable among intervention group children, although the differences were not statistically significant. Fewer intervention group children used feeder beakers with a spout as their main drinking utensil, used a baby bottle after their 4th birthday or usually took a bottle into bed. No difference was found in the consumption of bedtime drinks other than water (results not shown).Confectionary consumption was similar in both groups" (Scheiwe 2010, pg. 328).	Four‐year follow‐up, when children 4‐5 years of age	Some