Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD012024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3

Awwad 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods Single‐centred, controlled, double‐blind trial with randomisation into 1 of 2 parallel groups, with a treatment‐to‐placebo ratio of 2:1. 
The study took place in Beruit, Lebanon between September 2006 and December 2011
Participants 293 women aged 18 years or more, with an ultrasound‐diagnosed twin pregnancy
Exclusion criteria: ultrasonographically‐diagnosed fetal anomalies; elective cervical cerclage before 14 weeks' gestation; hypertension; diabetes; mellitus; asthma; history of deep vein thrombosis; history of hepatic disease or abnormal liver enzymes; pre‐existing renal disease or abnormal kidney function; and seizure disorders
Interventions Intervention group: participants received weekly injections of 250 mg 17‐hydroxyprogesterone caproate from 16 ‐ 20 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation
Control group: participants received weekly placebo from 16 ‐ 20 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation
Outcomes Primary outcome: preterm birth prior to 37 weeks of gestation
Secondary clinical outcomes measures included: early preterm birth (prior to 32 and 28 weeks of gestation); low birthweight < 2500 g or very low birthweight < 1500 g or extremely low birthweight < 1000 g; neonatal morbidity; perinatal mortality; and maternal morbidity. Neonatal morbidity defined as any of the following: respiratory distress syndrome; pneumonia; culture‐confirmed sepsis; intraventricular haemorrhage grade III or IV; necrotising enterocolitis; periventricular leukomalacia; retinopathy of prematurity; patent ductus arteriosus; seizures; and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Maternal morbidity included any of the following maternal complications occurring during the course of pregnancy: gestational diabetes mellitus; hypertensive disorders; and preterm premature rupture of the membranes
Safety outcome measures: local side effects and systemic adverse events
Notes Funding sources: This study was funded by a grant from the Medical Practice Plan at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon (principal investigator: Anwar H. Nassar, MD).
Declarations of interest: none of the authors of this article had any conflicts of interest to report
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Permutated block randomisation method. Random sequence generation used random‐number tables
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation envelopes prepared in pharmacy department. Research assistants opened the next opaque envelope following recruitment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Treating doctors, investigators, ancillary personnel, and participants were all blinded to treatment assignment for the duration of the trial
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Investigators and ancillary personnel blinded for the duration of the trial
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Outcome data reported for all randomised participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Stated outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk Sample size calculation met. ITT analysis undertaken. Ethics approval obtained