Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;21(11):e12384. doi: 10.2196/12384

Table 1.

Quality appraisal scores on the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool.

Study Total score (maximum=40) Star scorea Preamble Introduction Design Sample Data Ethic Result Discussion
van Lint et al (2015) [73] 33 4-star 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
Blakeman et al (2014) [70] 32 4-star 5 4 4 5 3 3 4 4
Ong et al (2016) [75] 32 4-star 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Forni Ogna et al (2013) [66] 31 3-star 5 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
Ishani et al (2016) [34] 31 3-star 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
Stark et al (2011) [63] 30 3-star 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
McGillicuddy et al (2013) [36] 30 3-star 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
Hayashi et al (2017) [76] 30 3-star 5 4 3 3 4 3 4 4
Diamantidis et al (2013) [65] 29 3-star 5 4 4 3 3 4 3 3
Reese et al (2017) [35] 29 3-star 5 5 4 3 2 2 3 5
Dey et al (2016) [74] 28 3-star 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4
Berman et al (2011) [59] 27 3-star 5 4 3 3 2 3 4 3
Rifkin et al (2013) [33] 27 3-star 5 4 3 4 3 2 3 3
Welch et al (2013) [69] 27 3-star 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 3
Connelly et al (2012) [64] 26 2-star 5 5 3 4 3 1 2 3
Neumann et al (2013) [68] 26 2-star 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3
Liu et al (2017) [77] 25 2-star 4 5 3 2 3 1 3 4
Diamantidis et al (2015) [72] 24 2-star 3 4 3 4 1 3 3 3
Minatodani et al (2013) [58] 23 2-star 3 4 2 1 3 4 3 3
Sevick et al (2005) [60] 22 2-star 3 4 3 2 2 2 3 3
Harrington et al (2014) [71] 20 1-star 3 4 2 3 3 0 3 2
Gallar et al (2007) [61] 18 1-star 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 3
Heiden et al (2013) [67] 18 1-star 3 4 3 1 1 0 3 3
Whitten et al (2008) [62] 14 1-star 2 4 1 1 1 0 1 4

a1-star: more than 1 SD below mean; 2-star, between 1 SD below mean and mean; 3-star, between mean and 1 SD above mean; 4-star, more than 1 SD above mean.