Skip to main content
. 2015 May 1;2015(5):CD011681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011681

Bendtsen 1996.

Methods Single‐centre, double‐blind, randomised, three‐arm cross‐over study: citalopram vs amitriptyline vs placebo
 No control for symptomatic/analgesic medications use
Participants Country: Denmark
 N = 40; Sex: 15 male, 25 female
 Mean age 40 (range 18 ‐ 60)
Diagnosis: Chronic tension‐type headache according to the International Headache Society Criteria (IHS 1988)
Exclusion criteria: previous participation in a clinical trial, migraine more than 1 day a month, serious somatic or psychiatric disease including depression, intake of opiates or benzodiazepines, overuse of analgesic drug (> 2 g aspirin a day), previous treatment with antidepressant drugs
Recruitment: outpatients from the Headache Clinic of Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen
Interventions Citalopram 20 mg/day
 Amitriptyline to a maximum of 75 mg/day
 Placebo
 Active treatment: total of 24 weeks (3 treatment periods each of 8 weeks, with a 2‐week washout period)
Outcomes 1. Headache Index (duration * severity)
 2. Headache severity (scale '0 = free condition', '5 = moderate headache', '10 = worst headache imaginable')
 3. Headache duration (hours/28 days)
 4. Headache frequency (days/28 days)
 5. Symptomatic/analgesic drug consumption (doses/28 days)
Notes 6 dropouts (15%):
  • amitriptyline: 1 for side effects (drowsiness)

  • citalopram: 2 for lack of effect

  • placebo: 1 for pregnancy, 2 for lack of effect


Per protocol analysis
No sample size calculation
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation sequence generated in blocks of 6 patients, method not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Drugs identical in appearance
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Moderate dropout rate, balanced, reasons fully reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information
Other bias High risk Financial support provided by Lundbeck Foundation