Skip to main content
. 2015 May 1;2015(5):CD011681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011681

Boz 2003.

Methods Single‐centre, open‐label, randomised parallel study: sertraline vs amitriptyline
 Control for symptomatic/analgesic medications use
Participants Country: Turkey
 N = 90; Sex: 11 male, 79 female
 Mean age: 37.8 (SD 12.2) sertraline, 40.4 (SD 11.4) amitriptyline
Diagnosis: Chronic tension‐type headache according to the International Headache Society Criteria (IHS 1988)
Exclusion criteria: presence of major depression or depression symptoms, antidepressant use in the previous year, score > 15 Hamilton Depression Scale or > 13 Beck Depression Inventory I‐II Scale, severe concomitant neurological and medical disorders, breast feeding and pregnancy
Recruitment: first visit at the outpatient clinic
Interventions N = 46 amitriptyline to a maximum of 25 mg/day
 N = 44 sertraline 25 mg/day
Active treatment: 12 weeks
Outcomes 1. Headache frequency (number of attacks/28 days)
 2. Duration (hours/day)
 3. Headache severity (scored on a 10‐point visual analogue scale)
 4. Headache index (headache frequency * average severity * duration/28 days)
 5. Number of patients with more than a 50% reduction in the headache index
 6. Symptomatic/analgesic drug consumption
Notes 22 patients met the criteria for co‐existing migraine (8 in Sertraline and 14 in Amitriptyline)
6 dropouts (7%):
  • amitriptyline: 3 (2 for side effects, 1 for worsening condition)

  • sertraline: 3 (1 for side effects, 2 for worsening condition)


Per protocol analyses
No sample size calculation
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated (supplemental communication by authors)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Patients sequentially allocated depending on time of presentation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label design
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Low dropout rate, balanced, reasons fully reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information
Other bias Low risk No financial support provided by drug companies