Skip to main content
. 2016 May 19;98:e9. doi: 10.1017/S0016672316000069

Table 3.

Power considerations under selected scenarios of λ magnitude, correction approach and effect size for uncommon variants and predetermined number of studies in meta-analysis.

RLA MLA LLA
No correction Single correction Double correction No correction Single correction Double correction No correction Single correction Double correction
(n = 25 studies) Power Power Power Power Power Power Power Power Power
OR = 1·1 MAF = 0·01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MAF = 0·03 0·25 0·13 0·1 0·1 0·03 0 0·17 0 0
OR = 1·2 MAF = 0·01 0·39 0·19 0·13 0·43 0·14 0·04 0·39 0·04 0
MAF = 0·03 33·2 28·58 23·93 33·81 20·71 10·67 32·52 8·95 0·81
OR = 1·3 MAF = 0·01 9·26 7·43 5·77 9·53 4·38 1·74 9·58 1·29 0·04
MAF = 0·03 96·85 95·74 94·01 97·12 92·89 85·55 96·94 83·54 47·98
OR = 1·4 MAF = 0·01 48·48 42·89 37·33 49·4 33·38 19·02 48·41 16·56 2·4
MAF = 0·03 100 100 99·99 100 99·96 99·94 99·98 99·88 98·14