Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 27;322(17):1661–1671. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15468

Table 2. Early Clinical Response for the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population and Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at Test of Cure in Modified ITT and Clinically Evaluable Populations.

End Points No. (%) Between-Group Difference, %
(1-Sided 97.5% CI)a
Lefamulin Moxifloxacin
US FDA Primary End Point
Early clinical response in ITT population, No. of patients 370 368
Responder 336 (90.8) 334 (90.8) 0.1 (–4.4 to ∞)
Nonresponder 29 (7.8) 31 (8.4)
Indeterminate 5 (1.4) 3 (0.8)
EMA Coprimary End Points and US FDA Secondary End Points
Investigator assessment of clinical response at test of cure in modified ITT population, No. of patients 368 368
Success 322 (87.5) 328 (89.1) –1.6 (–6.3 to ∞)
Failure 44 (12.0) 32 (8.7)
Indeterminate 2 (0.5) 8 (2.2)
Investigator assessment of clinical response at test of cure in clinically evaluable population, No. of patients 330 326
Success 296 (89.7) 305 (93.6) –3.9 (–8.2 to ∞)
Failure 34 (10.3) 21 (6.4)

Abbreviations: EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, Food and Drug Administration.

a

Calculated using a continuity-corrected z statistic for early clinical response and the Miettinen and Nurminen method with adjustment for the randomization stratification factors for investigator assessment of clinical response. The margin for noninferiority was –10%; a lower bound of the CI that did not exceed this margin indicated noninferiority for lefamulin vs moxifloxacin.