Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;40(1):262–283. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24370

Table 3.

Regions that showed probability of positive activation above 0.8 during reward receipt (A) and significant changes in functional connectivity with vmPFC during reward receipt (B)

Region Cluster size (voxels) Peak MNI (x,y,z)
A. Probabilistic map
1 >0.9 >0.8 P (t)
vmPFC (L) 0 5 19 0.97 (25.83) 0 38 10
vmPFC (R) 0 0 5 0.88 (23.53) 3 41 7
B. Connectivity map
vmPFC (L) positive
Middle occipital gyrus (L) 302 18.48 −27 −88 −11
Inferior occipital gyrus (L)
Middle occipital gyrus (R) 302 18.44 21 −88 −11
Inferior occipital gyrus (R)
Hippocampus (L) 12 7.15 24 −28 −2
Angular gyrus (R) 94 6.86 30 −70 28
Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (R) 24 6.02 54 23 22
Median cingulate gyri (R) 19 5.58 3 −22 31
Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (R) 12 5.22 51 14 34
vmPFC (L) negative
Cuneus (L/R) 674 9.94 −9 −76 −5
Calcarine (L/R)
Lingual gyrus (L/R)
Supplementary motor area (L) 299 8.91 −6 2 58
Insula (L) 153 6.83 −21 8 10
Dorsal striatum (L)
Precentral gyrus (L) 103 6.67 −42 −10 49
Insula (R) 19 6.83 36 14 7
Middle frontal gyrus (R) 20 6.26 39 −7 52
Precuneus (L) 23 5.98 −9 −58 61
Thalamus (R) 17 5.71 −15 −28 22
Calcarine (R) 27 5.62 33 −55 1
Lingual gyrus (R) 11 5.54 18 −46 −8
Putamen (R) 12 5.33 24 8 7
Superior parietal gyrus (R) 10 5.19 18 −58 61
vmPFC (R) positive
Middle occipital gyrus (L) 265 18.3 −27 −88 −11
Inferior occipital gyrus (L)
Middle occipital gyrus (R) 278 17.67 21 −88 −11
Inferior occipital gyrus (R)
Middle occipital gyrus (R) 51 6.64 30 −70 28
vmPFC (R) negative
Cuneus (L/R) 852 10.04 −6 −79 −5
Calcarine (L/R)
Lingual gyrus (L/R)
Supplementary motor area (L/R) 522 9.2 −6 5 55
Precentral gyrus (L)
Precuneus (L) 80 7.24 −9 −58 61
Precentral gyrus (R) 61 7.12 42 −4 52
Insula (L) 54 6.38 −39 11 7
Middle frontal gyrus (L) 29 6.3 −33 38 31
Precuneus (R) 44 6.24 9 −52 58
Dorsal striatum (L) 29 6.13 −21 8 10
Caudate (L) 15 5.82 3 8 13
Insula (R) 10 5.78 36 14 7
Middle frontal gyrus (R) 22 5.64 30 35 31

The number of voxels exceeding the threshold for probabilities of 0.8, 0.9, and 1 from each cluster are presented, in addition to the maximum t value and corresponding MNI coordinates. Main regions within the cluster, cluster size, peak t‐value within the cluster as well as the corresponding MNI coordinates for the clusters with cluster size above 10 are shown in the table (L, left; R, right; L/R, bilateral).