Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 18;40(18):5159–5171. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24763

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overlap with the DTI‐based parcellation results. (a). The overlap between the parcellation results obtained using the resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) of the Dataset 1 and anatomical connectivity‐based parcellation were calculated. The anatomical connectivity‐based parcellation results of the bilateral middle temporal gyrus (MTG) were defined from our previous work (Xu et al., 2015). (b). The quantitative overlap analyses between RSFC‐based parcellation of MTG results and that defined using anatomical connectivity‐based parcellation were calculated. The overlap analyses identified a high overlap between the parcellation results using different modalities [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]