Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;40(10):3091–3101. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24582

Table 1.

Clinical data

Patient ID Gender Age Dom TAS Lesion location UE‐FM Pinch‐ratio (A/U) Grip‐ratio (A/U) Motor score
1 m 59 1 42 PLIC 60 0.8 0.75 −0.69
2 f 60 0 44 PONS 64 1.15 0.89 1.46
3 m 55 0 22 CR 66 0.89 0.79 0.33
4 m 53 1 32 CR, BG 66 1.2 0.89 1.84
5 m 70 1 113 MED 49 0.82 0.77 −1.52
6 m 65 1 35 CR, CI 66 0.84 0.79 0.16
7 m 52 0 26 MED, IC 64 0.95 0.89 0.76
8 f 70 0 31 PONS 66 1.03 0.8 0.88
9 f 66 1 27 TC, PLIC 55 0.8 0.63 −1.59
10 f 51 0 97 MED 54 0.86 0.7 −1.19
11 m 73 0 54 CR 49 0.82 0.66 −1.95
12 f 79 1 11 TC, PLIC 66 1.28 1.1 2.89
13 f 75 1 197 IC, BG, CR 61 1.1 1.04 1.60
14 m 65 0 22 CR 60 0.82 0.42 −1.87
15 f 65 0 81 MED 60 0.68 0.72 −1.23
16 m 60 1 51 CR, BG, IC 59 0.77 0.82 −0.58
17 m 71 1 39 BG, CR 66 0.88 0.89 0.71

Note. Age (in years), gender (m, male; f, female), Dom, dominant hemisphere affected (0 = no; 1 = yes); TAS, time after stroke in month, stroke location (MED, media infarct; PLIC, posterior limb of the internal capsule; CR, corona radiate; CI, capsula interna; TC, thalamocapsular; BG, basal ganglia; PONS, pons; IC, insular cortex), UEFM, upper extremity Fugl‐Meyer, pinch and grip force ratio A/U (A, affected hand; U, unaffected hand). UEFM, pinch and grip force ration have been merged into one composite motor score.