Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;40(3):833–854. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24415

Table 7.

Comparison of the classification performance between AAL atlas and CC200 atlas

Method AAL atlas (116 ROIs) Craddock atlas (200 ROIs)
ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%)
Network 1 63.04 71.11 55.32 70.65 73.33 68.09
Network 2 67.39 73.33 61.70 68.48 80.00 57.45
Network 3 72.83 77.78 68.09 70.65 75.56 65.96
Network 4 59.78 77.78 42.55 65.22 77.78 53.19
Multiple network method 79.35 82.22 76.60 73.91 77.78 70.21