Table 7.
Comparison of the classification performance between AAL atlas and CC200 atlas
Method | AAL atlas (116 ROIs) | Craddock atlas (200 ROIs) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | |
Network 1 | 63.04 | 71.11 | 55.32 | 70.65 | 73.33 | 68.09 |
Network 2 | 67.39 | 73.33 | 61.70 | 68.48 | 80.00 | 57.45 |
Network 3 | 72.83 | 77.78 | 68.09 | 70.65 | 75.56 | 65.96 |
Network 4 | 59.78 | 77.78 | 42.55 | 65.22 | 77.78 | 53.19 |
Multiple network method | 79.35 | 82.22 | 76.60 | 73.91 | 77.78 | 70.21 |